Collective article record

Passive? Or Active?

Collective Archive Number CAN-0000-1016-C7C1 Permanent resolver

Source Summary

The foot? Or the ball? Whilst pimping the Joe Fudgepacker Dan Davage pimping of the manufactured gay marriage agenda, The John declareth: The community is quickly propelling towards marriage…. Hmmm… “is propelling” is an active-voice verb word combo. “is being propelled” is a passive-voice verb word combo. One is accurate – and it is not the one employed her by The John. Whether the Democrats like it or not, the gay community has its eyes set on marriage… Whether people such as Joe Fudgepacker and The John like it or not, some of us know that eyes being set on that will ultimately yield the same result as eyes remaining open during a certain climactic scene in the first Raiders of the Lost Ark movie. 150 years ago, slave ownership was the rich man’s lifestyle that the poor populace of the South was coreced into marching off to war to

The Source Summary reproduces the first 150 words of the source article unless a Collective editor has explicitly locked a replacement.

Read the original article View inbound sources

Interpretive context

Why this article may matter

Community significance

“Passive? Or Active?” may matter to community readers because it preserves a first-person or testimonial account connected to family and relationships, while also engaging community and organizing. Such accounts can document how an issue was understood and experienced from within the period or community being discussed.

Historical significance

As a publication record from 2011 at Transadvocate.com, “Passive? Or Active?” provides dated evidence of how family and relationships was being argued in relation to community and organizing. Comparing it with earlier and later records can reveal changes in vocabulary, evidence, and emphasis.

Policy significance

The article’s strongest policy connection is civil rights and anti-discrimination. It links that institutional frame to family and relationships and community and organizing, making it potentially useful for tracing how an argument moves from description or history into law, regulation, administration, or public practice.

Content analysis

Ranked themes and framings

Rank 1 is the dominant inferred theme or framing. Parent labels identify broader theme families; the relationship key beneath the diagram explains the line styles used for hierarchy, same-family relationships, overlap, and separate-but-related themes.

Themes

1
Family and relationshipsTheme family: Identity, culture, and community
100%
2
Community and organizingTheme family: Identity, culture, and community
57%
3
Law and civil rightsTheme family: Institutions, law, and public life
39%

Academic framing

1
Interpretive analysis
100%

Policy framing

1
Civil rights and anti-discrimination
100%

Editorial function

Source topics

Relationship key

Overlapping themes
Separate but related themes

The diagram distinguishes hierarchy, same-family relationships, overlap, and separate-but-related themes inferred within this article. It does not assert that all themes are mutually exclusive.

These classifications are inferred from article text and source metadata and remain directly editable. Relationship labels express corpus-analysis judgments, not immutable facts.

Granular comparative context

How “Family and relationships” appears across the Collective corpus

This article appeared 2 year(s) before the theme reached its highest annual presence in the registered corpus in 2013.

Relative presence by year

Peak year indexed to 100

9 2005

5 2006

17 2007

18 2008

11 2009

58 2011

19 2012

65 2013

17 2014

6 2015

12 2017

5 2018

1 2019

1 2021

1 2022

1 2024

Presence by member publication

Frequently co-occurring concepts

Academic framings in this topic

Policy framings in this topic

Values measure relative presence in the registered Collective corpus, not public search interest or public opinion.

Inbound-link and citation evidence

Documented circulation and reception

1 source-held reference records an early link or citation; the documented sources span 1 domain. The dated evidence currently falls in 2011. These observations describe circulation and reuse; they do not assign cultural worth or evaluate the communities, arguments, or people discussed.

1distinct source records documented

1distinct referring domains

0best available scholarly cited-by count

0books or volumes documented

1references retained by the source publication

2011observed years in dated evidence

Evidence by channel

Independent counts; bars are not additive

Source-held references1

Coverage of the evidence search

Shows what has actually been checked

Publisher-held referencesChecked · August 24, 2026

Scholarly indexesChecked · August 24, 2026

Book and volume searchNotchecked

Public-web searchNotconfigured

Collective corpus linksIndexed · August 31, 2026

Review scholarly results Review book results Review public-web results

Documented references over time

Dated source evidence currently stored by the Collective

1 2011

Reference retained by the source publicationSource-publication recordProvider-confirmed

Passive? Or Active? « ENDAblog

Passive? Or Active? « ENDAblog · endablog.wordpress.com · January 23, 2011

[...] Passive? Or Active? [Cross-posted at The TransAdvocate] [...]

Counts describe documented circulation and reception in the sources currently available to the Collective. They are not a score of quality, merit, popularity, or social value, and provider totals can overlap.

Article authors

Author profiles and related researchers

Kat

59 publications · 25 inbound sources/citations