Quit attacking your allies!
I have seen various version of this phrase. “Quit attacking your allies!” – many, many times. I’ve only been involved heavily in trans activism for about two years. How and why I’ve become as invested as I am is a long story; but at the end of the day, I am a woman who was assigned female at birth. I am cis. So, it’s odd that this statement has been directed at me, but it often has. It’s also something that I will never say. The reason that I am pledging never to say, “Quit attacking your allies!” is because it’s not a sincere defense or tactical criticism. It’s a threat. The implication is simply: If you criticize me, if you are angry with me, if you say anything that makes me uncomfortable, I will withdraw my support from your cause. In addition, the majority of the time, this phrase
The Source Summary reproduces the first 150 words of the source article unless a Collective editor has explicitly locked a replacement.
Why this article may matter
Community significance
“Quit attacking your allies!” may matter to community readers because it preserves a first-person or testimonial account connected to community and organizing, while also engaging violence, safety, and dehumanization. Such accounts can document how an issue was understood and experienced from within the period or community being discussed.
Historical significance
As a publication record from 2014 at Transadvocate.com, “Quit attacking your allies!” provides dated evidence of how community and organizing was being argued in relation to violence, safety, and dehumanization. Comparing it with earlier and later records can reveal changes in vocabulary, evidence, and emphasis.
Policy significance
The article’s strongest policy connection is research ethics and data governance. It links that institutional frame to community and organizing and violence, safety, and dehumanization, making it potentially useful for tracing how an argument moves from description or history into law, regulation, administration, or public practice.
Ranked themes and framings
Rank 1 is the dominant inferred theme or framing. Parent labels identify broader theme families; the relationship key beneath the diagram explains the line styles used for hierarchy, same-family relationships, overlap, and separate-but-related themes.
Themes
- 1Community and organizingTheme family: Identity, culture, and community100%
- 2Violence, safety, and dehumanizationTheme family: Power, ideology, and social conflict61%
- 3Transgender identity and historyTheme family: Identity, culture, and community39%
- 4Feminism and gender politicsTheme family: Power, ideology, and social conflict39%
- 5Science, evidence, and expertiseTheme family: Knowledge, history, and communication33%
- 6Family and relationshipsTheme family: Identity, culture, and community28%
Academic framing
- 1100%
Policy framing
- 1100%
Editorial function
Source topics
- Overlapping themes
- Related theme in the same family
- Separate but related themes
These classifications are inferred from article text and source metadata and remain directly editable. Relationship labels express corpus-analysis judgments, not immutable facts.
How “Community and organizing” appears across the Collective corpus
This article appeared 1 year(s) after the theme’s highest annual presence in the registered corpus in 2013.
Relative presence by year
Peak year indexed to 100Presence by member publication
Frequently co-occurring concepts
- Transgender identity and history531
- Law and civil rights300
- Violence, safety, and dehumanization187
- Education and youth177
- Culture, identity, and representation174
- Media, rhetoric, and discourse171
- Feminism and gender politics165
- History, archives, and memory158
- Public policy and governance132
- Labor, economics, and institutions124
Academic framings in this topic
Policy framings in this topic
- Civil rights and anti-discrimination122
- Public accommodations and facilities104
- Criminal justice and public safety82
- Elections and democratic governance70
- Research ethics and data governance51
- Housing and social services25
- Administrative classification and identity documents23
- Labor and employment policy22
Values measure relative presence in the registered Collective corpus, not public search interest or public opinion.
Documented circulation and reception
2 source-held references record early links or citations; the documented sources span 3 distinct domains. The dated evidence currently spans 2014–2016. These observations describe circulation and reuse; they do not assign cultural worth or evaluate the communities, arguments, or people discussed.
Evidence by channel
Independent counts; bars are not additiveCoverage of the evidence search
Shows what has actually been checkedDocumented references over time
Dated source evidence currently stored by the CollectiveM.A.Melby
Quit attacking your allies!
That old familiar pain. | SINMANTYX
[…] once claimed that I would never say “quit attacking your allies” and I won’t. This is not that. This is a general sentiment that I am framing in the […]
All the linkspam forever more (September 2014)
[…] M.A.Melby writes at Trans Advocate, “Quit attacking your allies!“: […]
Counts describe documented circulation and reception in the sources currently available to the Collective. They are not a score of quality, merit, popularity, or social value, and provider totals can overlap.
Author profiles and related researchers
Related authors in the Collective corpus
Related authors are calculated from co-authorship, shared themes and framings, and citation relationships in the registered corpus. This does not imply a personal or institutional association.
Continue through the Collective
The TERFs Are Becoming Restless.
Provides a contextually related perspective from elsewhere in the Collective.
Hate is a weird thing. There are clear stages it goes through during its lifetime, from ridicule and baseless claims to anger and violence. Many people have reasons…
Naming the problem
Provides a contextually related perspective from elsewhere in the Collective.
What follows are the words of a cisgender feminist who can no longer not name the problem: I suppose in the past I’ve avoided, for the most part,…
#TERFLogic: Is it wrong to tolerate trans people? Yes, yes it is.
Provides a contextually related perspective from elsewhere in the Collective.
Also, trans people are possible murderers!!! (unlike cis women, right?) And besides, trans women commit crimes (like rape and pedophiliat) at the same (or even greater!!11) rate that…
#TERFLogic: Abortion group changes name & proves that trans people erase “biology”
Provides a contextually related perspective from elsewhere in the Collective.
A pro-choice fund in Texas changed its name in 2014. Some TERFs found out in 2016 and see the name change as proof that biology itself is somehow…