This profile is a persistent identity and corpus record. Bibliographic facts, author-supplied information, editorial verification, computational measurements, model inferences, and external indexes are identified separately throughout the page.
Profile status
Unclaimed
7registered publications
8,666analyzed words
2014–2015represented publication period
4.7effective primary themes
12documented inbound sources/citations
1member publications represented
Interactive corpus map
Patterns in registered work
Explore how recurring themes and framings connect across this author’s registered publications. Each topic opens its Collective archive.
ThemeAcademic framingPolicy framingRecurring co-occurrenceConnection across framing typesBroader and narrower term
Drag a topic to rearrange the map. Drag empty space to move the constellation, use the mouse wheel or controls to zoom, and hover or focus a topic to emphasize its direct connections. Line strength reflects recurrence in this author’s registered corpus; it does not imply agreement or causation.
This analysis covers 7 registered publications dated 2014–2015. Full source text was available for 7 records, partial text for 0, and metadata only for 0.
The registered corpus is the unit of analysis. These statistics describe available texts and metadata; they are not claims about the author’s personality, intelligence, intentions, identity, or private beliefs.
7publications analyzed
1,391median words per publication
100.0%full-text coverage
0.0%archival-copy coverage
0co-authored publications
0possible duplicate groups
Registered output by year
PublicationsDocumented reception
611
2014
11
2015
Registered publication output trends downward across the represented years. Linear model R²: 1.00.
Publication-length distribution
1613–749
0749–885
1885–1,021
11,021–1,157
01,157–1,292
21,292–1,428
11,428–1,564
11,564–1,700
Mean 1,238 words · median 1,391 · standard deviation 361.
Education and youth · Feminism and gender politics · Community and organizing · Transgender identity and history
Potential change points compare rolling three-year thematic distributions with Jensen-Shannon divergence. They are model-derived boundaries, not authoritative divisions in the author’s intellectual biography.
Theme ecology
Breadth, concentration, and communities
96.3%normalized thematic breadth
4.7effective primary themes
0.225theme concentration (HHI)
100%mean primary-theme confidence
Primary-theme assignments are broadly distributed. The most recurrent primary themes are Education and youth, Feminism and gender politics, Community and organizing.
Proximity reflects corpus-relative lexical similarity. Larger nodes have more documented inbound evidence; node color reflects the primary theme.
Publication; color identifies primary themeStronger lexical similarityLarger node: more documented reception
The semantic map uses TF-IDF vectors and cosine similarity within this registered corpus. Position is produced by a force layout from the strongest similarity edges; proximity is relative, not an absolute measure of meaning.
Administrative classification and identity documents
Interpretive analysis
2
1
0
1
Sociological analysis
0
0
1
0
Historical analysis
0
0
0
0
Language and rhetorical form
Measurable textual characteristics
0.807moving-average lexical diversity
21.7mean sentence length
412.7mean paragraph length
11.6Flesch grade estimate
Rhetorical feature profile
Axes are normalized to display scales stated in the methods note; the chart is comparative within the profile, not a grading instrument.
Sentence-length distribution
1602–16
14616–29
5529–43
2443–57
757–70
570–84
084–97
197–111
4.2questions per 1,000 words
18.7quoted passages per 1,000 words
8.7outbound links per 1,000 words
Distinctive terms relative to the Collective baseline
splc11.1
privilege9.7
observer9.6
vagina9.0
star8.8
photograph8.8
girls8.2
boys8.1
list7.6
watch7.6
concerning7.3
brennan7.2
cathy7.2
penis7.2
donations7.0
image6.8
phrase6.8
tribune6.8
View rates and comparison values
Term
Author rate / 1,000
Collective rate / 1,000
Log-odds z
splc
4.99
0.15
11.12
privilege
5.23
0.49
9.66
observer
4.52
0.04
9.61
vagina
3.33
0.13
9.01
star
4.04
0.34
8.81
photograph
3.80
0.03
8.79
girls
5.70
0.93
8.23
boys
3.80
0.38
8.10
list
2.85
0.21
7.64
watch
2.61
0.16
7.58
concerning
2.61
0.20
7.25
brennan
3.80
0.53
7.24
cathy
3.33
0.39
7.24
penis
2.38
0.16
7.19
donations
1.90
0.04
6.96
image
3.09
0.39
6.80
phrase
1.90
0.09
6.79
tribune
3.80
0.01
6.77
photo
1.90
0.11
6.64
attacking
1.66
0.07
6.48
minnesota
1.66
0.02
6.12
clothes
1.66
0.11
6.11
mark
1.43
0.07
5.96
women
12.12
5.25
5.89
Lexical statistics are descriptive properties of the available texts. They do not diagnose writing quality, intelligence, personality, or intent. Distinctive terms are compared with a sampled Collective baseline using smoothed log-odds.
Source families are inferred from link domains and URL patterns. They describe the ecology of linked evidence and references, not the reliability or ideological position of an individual source.
Collaboration and relationships
Co-authorship and corpus similarity
Author relationship network
Co-authorship and corpus-based similarity are displayed as different relationship types.
Co-authorship, corpus similarity, citation relationships, and publication overlap are shown as distinct relationship types. A corpus relationship does not imply a personal, institutional, or political association.
Documented circulation and reception
How evidence of reuse is distributed across the corpus
12documented source records
12distinct referring domains
0scholarly citation records or provider total
0books or edited-volume references
100.0%publications with evidence
0.262reception concentration (Gini)
Evidence by channel
Source-publication references5
Public-web references0
Scholarly citing works0
Books and edited volumes0
Links inside the Collective7
Media and educational references0
Documented references over time
102014
12015
12016
Reception concentration
The most-referenced 10% of publications account for approximately 25.0% of documented reception.
Reception measures documented circulation and reuse across the evidence sources available to the Collective. They do not establish quality, correctness, cultural worth, or the author’s social standing. Provider totals can overlap.
Comparative corpus context
Contrasts with other registered Collective publications
The comparison baseline contains 1,200 other registered publications. Differences are descriptive contrasts, not author rankings.
Comparisons use the rest of the registered Collective as the default baseline. Percentage-point differences and standardized effects describe corpus contrasts; they are not rankings or evaluations of authors.
Corpus coverage
Places, institutions, periods, and populations represented
Geographic coverage
United States3
Australia1
Europe1
Institutions named
The Pacific Justice Institute1
Historical periods
2010s2
Populations discussed
women7
transgender people4
activists and organizers4
children and adolescents3
students and educators2
families and parents2
Coverage measures recurring places, institutions, historical periods, scopes, and population terms in the registered texts. It describes what is present in the corpus and does not judge omissions or infer the author’s identity or attitudes.
Guided reading paths
Different ways into the registered corpus
Representative workClosest to the semantic center of recurring work in the registered corpus.
These categories describe structural positions in the registered corpus. They do not establish scholarly quality, correctness, or cultural value.
Trust, correction, and reuse
Provenance, profile control, and research data
How to read this profile
Source-supplied
Provided by a member publication.
Author-verified
Confirmed by the profile owner.
Editor-verified
Reviewed by a Collective editor.
Computationally measured
Calculated directly from registered text or metadata.
Model-inferred
Produced by a versioned analytical model.
External index
Obtained from an external bibliographic or web index.
Profile actions
Authors and other knowledgeable parties may request identity corrections, article-association review, classification review, or visibility changes. Requests create an editorial revision record rather than silently replacing prior data.
If you’re of my generation and grew up in the U.S., you’ll remember the movie “Kindergarten Cop” where a gruff police officer goes undercover as a Kindergarten teacher. At one point, one of his students raises his hand…
The Observer recently featured a photograph of a tourist casually sexually assaulting a trans feminine performer by slipping his hand under her dress and squeezing her breast while posing for a picture. The photo was featured as one…
In late November of last year, Secular Woman began a petition asking the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) to list Cathy Brennan’s Gender Identity Watch as a hate group. In January, during the SPLC’s internal discussions concerning their…
I have seen various version of this phrase. “Quit attacking your allies!” – many, many times. I’ve only been involved heavily in trans activism for about two years. How and why I’ve become as invested as I am…
At first, I wasn’t going to write a response piece to Caroline Criado-Perez (CCP) article concerning the term “cis”, because many of her ideas were similar to those in Sarah Ditum’s post I recently responded to. Then I…
Months after the Minneapolis Star Tribune was strongly criticized for their coverage of Cece McDonald’s case, despite local trans activists’ earnest attempts to work with the Star Tribune to better understand the paper’s responsibility to use professional standards…
There are many things possible in the universe. If you are called a TERF it could be that the person who said it is actually a self-loathing misogynist who hates feminism and puppies. It could be that the…
