Collective article record

The Criminal Behavior of the Serial Exterminist

Collective Archive Number CAN-0000-0865-E5FC Permanent resolver

Source Summary

as if you needed to read any more… THE CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR OF THE SERIAL RAPIST From 1984 to 1986, FBI Special Agents assigned to theNationalCenterfor the Analysis of Violent Crime (NCAVC) interviewed 41 men who were responsible for raping 837 victims. Previous issues of the FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin provided an introduction to this research (1) and the characteristics of the rapists and their victims. (2) This article, however, describes the behavior of these serial rapists during and following the commission of their sexual assaults. The information presented is applicable only to the men interviewed; it is not intended to be generalized to all men who rape. The Report by Robert R. Hazelwood, M.S. , Special Agent, Behavioral Science Instruction/Research Unit,Quantico,VAgives an excellent insight into the major methods of approach. The one which comes close to fitting a pattern espouse by Dr Jacobs or Anita Schatz is “The Con” The

The Source Summary reproduces the first 150 words of the source article unless a Collective editor has explicitly locked a replacement.

Read the original article View inbound sources

Interpretive context

Why this article may matter

Community significance

“The Criminal Behavior of the Serial Exterminist” may matter to community readers because it preserves a first-person or testimonial account connected to science, evidence, and expertise, while also engaging law and civil rights. Such accounts can document how an issue was understood and experienced from within the period or community being discussed.

Historical significance

As a publication record from 2012 at Transadvocate.com, “The Criminal Behavior of the Serial Exterminist” provides dated evidence of how science, evidence, and expertise was being argued in relation to law and civil rights. Comparing it with earlier and later records can reveal changes in vocabulary, evidence, and emphasis.

Policy significance

The article’s strongest policy connection is criminal justice and public safety. It links that institutional frame to science, evidence, and expertise and law and civil rights, making it potentially useful for tracing how an argument moves from description or history into law, regulation, administration, or public practice.

Content analysis

Ranked themes and framings

Rank 1 is the dominant inferred theme or framing. Parent labels identify broader theme families; the relationship key beneath the diagram explains the line styles used for hierarchy, same-family relationships, overlap, and separate-but-related themes.

Themes

1
Science, evidence, and expertiseTheme family: Knowledge, history, and communication
100%
2
Law and civil rightsTheme family: Institutions, law, and public life
38%
3
Transgender identity and historyTheme family: Identity, culture, and community
28%
4
Culture, identity, and representationTheme family: Identity, culture, and community
19%
5
Violence, safety, and dehumanizationTheme family: Power, ideology, and social conflict
13%

Academic framing

1
Psychological analysis
100%
2
Interpretive analysis
19%
3
Empirical and quantitative research
12%

Policy framing

1
Criminal justice and public safety
100%

Editorial function

Source topics

Relationship key

Separate but related themes

The diagram distinguishes hierarchy, same-family relationships, overlap, and separate-but-related themes inferred within this article. It does not assert that all themes are mutually exclusive.

These classifications are inferred from article text and source metadata and remain directly editable. Relationship labels express corpus-analysis judgments, not immutable facts.

Granular comparative context

How “Science, evidence, and expertise” appears across the Collective corpus

This article was published during the theme’s highest-presence year in the registered corpus (2012).

Relative presence by year

Peak year indexed to 100

1 2005

2 2006

19 2007

7 2008

3 2009

2 2010

21 2011

46 2012

43 2013

21 2014

12 2015

3 2016

20 2017

11 2018

5 2019

3 2020

1 2022

1 2024

1 2025

Presence by member publication

Frequently co-occurring concepts

Academic framings in this topic

Policy framings in this topic

Values measure relative presence in the registered Collective corpus, not public search interest or public opinion.

Inbound-link and citation evidence

Documented circulation and reception

No broad reception evidence has been documented yet; this may reflect unconfigured or incomplete indexes rather than an absence of circulation. These observations describe circulation and reuse; they do not assign cultural worth or evaluate the communities, arguments, or people discussed.

0distinct source records documented

0distinct referring domains

0best available scholarly cited-by count

0books or volumes documented

0references retained by the source publication

—observed years in dated evidence

Evidence by channel

Independent counts; bars are not additive

No channel totals are available yet.

Coverage of the evidence search

Shows what has actually been checked

Publisher-held referencesChecked · August 24, 2026

Scholarly indexesChecked · August 24, 2026

Book and volume searchNotchecked

Public-web searchNotconfigured

Collective corpus linksIndexed · August 31, 2026

Review scholarly results Review book results Review public-web results

No individual references have been stored yet. This can mean that source-held pingbacks have not been imported, provider access is not configured, or available indexes do not expose this work in a machine-readable form.

Counts describe documented circulation and reception in the sources currently available to the Collective. They are not a score of quality, merit, popularity, or social value, and provider totals can overlap.

Article authors

Author profiles and related researchers

Jenna

7 publications · 5 inbound sources/citations