Collective article record

Glossary

Collective Archive Number CAN-0000-1426-498E Permanent resolver

Source Summary

Terms, concepts, and acronyms used by our authors in their transgender discourse. Words in bold are glossy terms. Suggested citation: Glossary. TransAdvocate. (2014, March 15). Retrieved [current_date format=’F d, Y’], from https://www.transadvocate.com/glossary. 1st Wave: Feminism from the mid-1800s to the early 1900s, which tended to focus on women’s suffrage. Racism was a significant issue and genderqueer individuals were shut out of the movement. 2nd Wave: Feminism from around 1945 – 1980. This wave of feminism was focused on Women’s Liberation. To the dismay of intersectional 2nd Wave feminists, privilege-blind optics became a problem within 2nd wave feminist discourse. At this time, Janice Raymond’s Transsexual Empire: The Making of the She-Male gained some measure of favor. 3rd Wave: Feminism from around 1980 – 2010. Focused on addressing the exclusionary practices of previous feminist waves. Sandy Stone, a trans woman, and victim of Janice Raymond’s harassment published The Empire Strikes Back, which

The Source Summary reproduces the first 150 words of the source article unless a Collective editor has explicitly locked a replacement.

Read the original article View inbound sources

Interpretive context

Why this article may matter

Community significance

“Glossary” may matter to community readers because it preserves a first-person or testimonial account connected to feminism and gender politics, while also engaging transgender identity and history. Such accounts can document how an issue was understood and experienced from within the period or community being discussed.

Historical significance

The article may have historical value because it explicitly interprets or preserves material concerning feminism and gender politics. Published in 2014 by Transadvocate.com, it can be read both for the history it describes and as evidence of how transgender identity and history was framed at that moment.

Policy significance

The article’s strongest policy connection is public accommodations and facilities and civil rights and anti-discrimination. It links that institutional frame to feminism and gender politics and transgender identity and history, making it potentially useful for tracing how an argument moves from description or history into law, regulation, administration, or public practice.

Content analysis

Ranked themes and framings

Rank 1 is the dominant inferred theme or framing. Parent labels identify broader theme families; the relationship key beneath the diagram explains the line styles used for hierarchy, same-family relationships, overlap, and separate-but-related themes.

Themes

1
Feminism and gender politicsTheme family: Power, ideology, and social conflict
100%
2
Transgender identity and historyTheme family: Identity, culture, and community
77%
3
Media, rhetoric, and discourseTheme family: Knowledge, history, and communication
47%
4
Race and intersectionalityTheme family: Power, ideology, and social conflict
47%
5
Community and organizingTheme family: Identity, culture, and community
31%
6
Culture, identity, and representationTheme family: Identity, culture, and community
23%

Academic framing

1
Philosophical and ontological analysis
100%
2
Clinical and medical analysis
52%
3
Historical analysis
43%
4
Interpretive analysis
24%

Policy framing

1
Public accommodations and facilities
100%
2
Civil rights and anti-discrimination
44%

Editorial function

Source topics

Relationship key

Overlapping themes
Separate but related themes
Related theme in the same family

The diagram distinguishes hierarchy, same-family relationships, overlap, and separate-but-related themes inferred within this article. It does not assert that all themes are mutually exclusive.

These classifications are inferred from article text and source metadata and remain directly editable. Relationship labels express corpus-analysis judgments, not immutable facts.

Granular comparative context

How “Feminism and gender politics” appears across the Collective corpus

This article appeared 1 year(s) after the theme’s highest annual presence in the registered corpus in 2013.

Relative presence by year

Peak year indexed to 100

2 2006

16 2007

2 2008

3 2009

2 2010

7 2011

9 2012

94 2013

44 2014

21 2015

21 2016

43 2017

7 2018

3 2019

3 2020

3 2021

1 2024

1 2025

Presence by member publication

Frequently co-occurring concepts

Academic framings in this topic

Policy framings in this topic

Values measure relative presence in the registered Collective corpus, not public search interest or public opinion.

Inbound-link and citation evidence

Documented circulation and reception

3 source-held references record early links or citations; the documented sources span 4 distinct domains; the strongest available scholarly index reports 361 citing works. The dated evidence currently spans 2012–2026. These observations describe circulation and reuse; they do not assign cultural worth or evaluate the communities, arguments, or people discussed.

105distinct source records documented

4distinct referring domains

361best available scholarly cited-by count

0books or volumes documented

3references retained by the source publication

2012–2026observed years in dated evidence

Evidence by channel

Independent counts; bars are not additive

Source-held references3

Scholarly citing works361

Links inside the Collective2

Coverage of the evidence search

Shows what has actually been checked

Publisher-held referencesChecked · October 15, 2026

Scholarly indexesChecked · October 15, 2026

361

Book and volume searchNotchecked

Public-web searchNotconfigured

Collective corpus linksIndexed · October 15, 2026

355 Crossref361 OpenCitations

Review scholarly results Review book results Review public-web results

Documented references over time

Yearly scholarly series: OpenCitations, combined with dated non-scholarly evidence

3 2012

1 2013

6 2014

4 2015

4 2016

2 2017

2 2018

7 2019

16 2020

11 2021

9 2022

9 2023

7 2024

16 2025

5 2026

Collective linkCollective corpusDirectly verified

Proof: The Facts of Life vs the Cisgender Debate

Cristan Williams · collective-demo.transhouston.com · November 3, 2021

The TransAdvocate Glossary defines Cisgender Media (cis media) as:

Collective linkCollective corpusDirectly verified