Michael Bailey and Alice Dreger Are Up For GLAAD Awards For Television Screenwriting For Their Work On The Jan. 29, 2011, Edition of Saturday Night Live
Well, I can’t say for certain that Bailey and Dreger wrote this bit (after all, it could have been Cathy Brennan and Shannon Avery for all I know – or maybe a menage a transphobique combining their ‘talents’ with those of Israel Luna.) watch?v=F-lQm9RpQ2s However, I can say for certain that the Bailey-Dreger Axis pre-legitimized it. I feel oh so certain that an amount of blog activity at least equal to that complaining about the $2,500 that the government is trying to extract from Dan Choi will be expended to call out whoever did come up with this pile of St. Barney’s wet dream jizz and managed to get it on national television. [Cross-posted at ENDABlog]
The Source Summary reproduces the first 150 words of the source article unless a Collective editor has explicitly locked a replacement.
Why this article may matter
Community significance
“Michael Bailey and Alice Dreger Are Up For GLAAD Awards For Television Screenwriting For Their Work On The Jan. 29, 2011, Edition of Saturday Night Live” may matter to community readers because it preserves a first-person or testimonial account connected to public policy and governance, while also engaging interpretive analysis. Such accounts can document how an issue was understood and experienced from within the period or community being discussed.
Historical significance
As a publication record from 2011 at Transadvocate.com, “Michael Bailey and Alice Dreger Are Up For GLAAD Awards For Television Screenwriting For Their Work On The Jan. 29, 2011, Edition of Saturday Night Live” provides dated evidence of how public policy and governance was being argued in relation to interpretive analysis. Comparing it with earlier and later records can reveal changes in vocabulary, evidence, and emphasis.
Policy significance
“Michael Bailey and Alice Dreger Are Up For GLAAD Awards For Television Screenwriting For Their Work On The Jan. 29, 2011, Edition of Saturday Night Live” discusses institutions, law, or governance in connection with public policy and governance. Even without a dominant policy classification, the article may help researchers identify practical consequences for interpretive analysis.
Ranked themes and framings
Rank 1 is the dominant inferred theme or framing. Parent labels identify broader theme families; the relationship diagram distinguishes sub-themes, siblings, overlap, and separate-but-related themes.
Themes
- 1Public policy and governanceTheme family: Institutions, law, and public life100%
Academic framing
- 1100%
Editorial function
Source topics
These classifications are inferred from article text and source metadata and remain directly editable. Relationship labels express corpus-analysis judgments, not immutable facts.
How “Public policy and governance” appears across the Collective corpus
This article appeared 2 year(s) before the theme reached its highest annual presence in the registered corpus in 2013.
Relative presence by year
Peak year indexed to 100Presence by member publication
Frequently co-occurring concepts
- Transgender identity and history200
- Law and civil rights159
- Community and organizing129
- Culture, identity, and representation67
- Labor, economics, and institutions58
- Education and youth58
- Family and relationships58
- Media, rhetoric, and discourse51
- Violence, safety, and dehumanization45
- Healthcare and medicine40
Academic framings in this topic
Policy framings in this topic
Values measure relative presence in the registered Collective corpus, not public search interest or public opinion.
Sources that reference this article
No individual inbound sources have been stored yet. Counts can still appear when a scholarly index supplies aggregate citation metadata.
Coverage combines internal Collective links, verified Webmentions, curated evidence, supported scholarly indexes, and optional public-web discovery. Search-result candidates remain visibly distinct from directly verified links and provider-confirmed citations. This is not an exhaustive index of the public web or of Google Scholar.
Author profiles and related researchers
Related authors in the Collective corpus
Autumn Sandeen
Shares registered themes including Law and civil rights, Transgender identity and history, Family and relationships.
Gwen Smith
Shares registered themes including Law and civil rights, Transgender identity and history, Family and relationships.
TransAdvocate Staff
Shares registered themes including Law and civil rights, Transgender identity and history, Family and relationships.
Admin
Shares registered themes including Law and civil rights, Transgender identity and history, Family and relationships.
Cristan
Shares registered themes including Law and civil rights, Transgender identity and history, Family and relationships.
Marti Abernathey
Shares registered themes including Law and civil rights, Transgender identity and history, Family and relationships.
Related authors are calculated from co-authorship, shared themes and framings, and citation relationships in the registered corpus. This does not imply a personal or institutional association.
Continue through the Collective
Gays Who Want Marriage: $10 Million to Smother the Employment Needs of All Trans People (and Most LGB People)
Examines legal, institutional, or policy consequences connected to the shared theme.
From The Land of The John: Via press release from Freedom to Marry, background on their new “Why Marriage Matters” Campaign: Freedom to Marry will be running ads…
The Next Step Toward Exterminating the Concerns of Working-Class LGBs and ALL Trans People
Approaches the shared subject through a related analytical or disciplinary frame.
I’ll point to it: The Next Step Toward Equality: Repealing DOMA But I’ll quote none of it – and I damn sure wan’t analyze it, lest I be…
Passive? Or Active?
Approaches the shared subject through a related analytical or disciplinary frame.
The foot? Or the ball? Whilst pimping the Joe Fudgepacker Dan Davage pimping of the manufactured gay marriage agenda, The John declareth: The community is quickly propelling towards…
How Bad Was the SNL Thing?
Approaches the shared subject through a related analytical or disciplinary frame.
Even The John thought it was wrong: A colleague defended the SNL skit by comparing it to lampooning Sarah Palin – isn’t it okay to make fun of…