Freaks and Perverts
As a follow-up to the previous post, from Yahoo News: ‘X’ now a gender option in Australian passports – Yahoo! News The comments (nearly all from US readers) are instructive. Here’s some of the more popular ones, those “upvoted”. And the world draws closer to the end of times. Why is it the world bends over backwards for these broken people? Let them adjust to the mainstream. A tiny percentage of confused nutters shouldn’t get to modify any aspects of society. Male or female, that’s it! Don’t confuse yourself with another! Oh this is just ridiculous!!!!!! What really surprises me though is that America with all it’s Gay lovers didn’t do this first. God that just makes me sick. A very small amount of people in the world are actually born with this problem then there’s way more people who just THINK they’re not the right gender. Well guess what,
The Source Summary reproduces the first 150 words of the source article unless a Collective editor has explicitly locked a replacement.
Why this article may matter
Community significance
“Freaks and Perverts” may matter to community readers because it preserves a first-person or testimonial account connected to culture, identity, and representation, while also engaging transgender identity and history. Such accounts can document how an issue was understood and experienced from within the period or community being discussed.
Historical significance
As a publication record from 2011 at Transadvocate.com, “Freaks and Perverts” provides dated evidence of how culture, identity, and representation was being argued in relation to transgender identity and history. Comparing it with earlier and later records can reveal changes in vocabulary, evidence, and emphasis.
Policy significance
The article’s strongest policy connection is administrative classification and identity documents and healthcare regulation. It links that institutional frame to culture, identity, and representation and transgender identity and history, making it potentially useful for tracing how an argument moves from description or history into law, regulation, administration, or public practice.
Ranked themes and framings
Rank 1 is the dominant inferred theme or framing. Parent labels identify broader theme families; the relationship diagram distinguishes sub-themes, siblings, overlap, and separate-but-related themes.
Themes
- 1Culture, identity, and representationTheme family: Identity, culture, and community100%
- 2Transgender identity and historyTheme family: Identity, culture, and community87%
- 3Healthcare and medicineTheme family: Institutions, law, and public life87%
- 4Public policy and governanceTheme family: Institutions, law, and public life80%
- 5Community and organizingTheme family: Identity, culture, and community53%
- 6Education and youthTheme family: Institutions, law, and public life53%
Academic framing
- 1100%
- 289%
Policy framing
- 1100%
- 213%
Editorial function
Source topics
These classifications are inferred from article text and source metadata and remain directly editable. Relationship labels express corpus-analysis judgments, not immutable facts.
How “Culture, identity, and representation” appears across the Collective corpus
This article appeared 2 year(s) before the theme reached its highest annual presence in the registered corpus in 2013.
Relative presence by year
Peak year indexed to 100Presence by member publication
Frequently co-occurring concepts
Academic framings in this topic
Policy framings in this topic
Values measure relative presence in the registered Collective corpus, not public search interest or public opinion.
Sources that reference this article
No individual inbound sources have been stored yet. Counts can still appear when a scholarly index supplies aggregate citation metadata.
Coverage combines internal Collective links, verified Webmentions, curated evidence, supported scholarly indexes, and optional public-web discovery. Search-result candidates remain visibly distinct from directly verified links and provider-confirmed citations. This is not an exhaustive index of the public web or of Google Scholar.
Author profiles and related researchers
Related authors in the Collective corpus
Related authors are calculated from co-authorship, shared themes and framings, and citation relationships in the registered corpus. This does not imply a personal or institutional association.
Continue through the Collective
You might be a TERF if…
Provides broader orientation to the subject and terminology assumed by this article.
I’ve noticed that there seems to be some confusion about what a TERF is so, here’s a quick guide to help you figure out if you’re a TERF.…
1992: Bigenderal Introduction and Rejection
Offers a critical, contrasting, or corrective interpretation of the shared issue.
Rebuttal to Prince, February 1992 Bigenderal Introduction: TERMINOLOGY FOR THE CROSSDRESSING COMMUNITY by Virginia Prince The matter of labels in our community has come up many times and…
1993: Texas Association for Transsexual Support TG Usage
Examines legal, institutional, or policy consequences connected to the shared theme.
COMMENTARY by [Name Withheld] If ever an effort deserved to be called the tip of the spear, it is the International Conference on Transgender Law and Employment Policy.…
1991: Virginia Prince on the use of Transgender
Offers a critical, contrasting, or corrective interpretation of the shared issue.
What follows is an exchange between Virginia Prince and Tere Fredrickson, co-organizer (along with the primary organizer, Phyllis Frye, VP of GCTC) of the ICTLEP Conference. Dear Linda…