Collective article record

“Being Feminist” and Their Transphobia Problem

Collective Archive Number CAN-0000-0270-C519 Permanent resolver

Source Summary

*Disclaimer* This post is on a site exposing TERFs but we are not insinuating that Being Feminists are part of that group. UPDATE: LA has apologized for and removed the inflammatory post on Being Feminist’s Facebook page! Thank you so much! https://www.facebook.com/BeingFeminist/posts/459424844126762 Dear members, I am the admin ~LA, and I’m writing to say sorry to all the people on the page who were hurt and marginalised either directly or indirectly as a result of my post from yesterday. The post has been deleted. I am sorry that my post made some trans*people feel unsafe here. That was the opposite of my intent. I truly believe in the equality of everyone in the feminist movement, and in the rights of everyone to assert their identity. I believe that everyone has a place in the feminist movement, so long as we all believe in the equality of all PEOPLE, no matter

The Source Summary reproduces the first 150 words of the source article unless a Collective editor has explicitly locked a replacement.

Read the original article View inbound sources

Interpretive context

Why this article may matter

Community significance

““Being Feminist” and Their Transphobia Problem” may matter to community readers because it preserves a first-person or testimonial account connected to feminism and gender politics, while also engaging community and organizing. Such accounts can document how an issue was understood and experienced from within the period or community being discussed.

Historical significance

The article may have historical value because it explicitly interprets or preserves material concerning feminism and gender politics. Published in 2013 by The TERFs, it can be read both for the history it describes and as evidence of how community and organizing was framed at that moment.

Policy significance

The article’s strongest policy connection is civil rights and anti-discrimination and public accommodations and facilities. It links that institutional frame to feminism and gender politics and community and organizing, making it potentially useful for tracing how an argument moves from description or history into law, regulation, administration, or public practice.

Content analysis

Ranked themes and framings

Rank 1 is the dominant inferred theme or framing. Parent labels identify broader theme families; the relationship diagram distinguishes sub-themes, siblings, overlap, and separate-but-related themes.

Themes

1
Feminism and gender politicsTheme family: Power, ideology, and social conflict
100%
2
Community and organizingTheme family: Identity, culture, and community
56%
3
Violence, safety, and dehumanizationTheme family: Power, ideology, and social conflict
54%
4
Transgender identity and historyTheme family: Identity, culture, and community
48%
5
Race and intersectionalityTheme family: Power, ideology, and social conflict
39%
6
Law and civil rightsTheme family: Institutions, law, and public life
23%

Academic framing

1
Clinical and medical analysis
100%
2
Interpretive analysis
83%
3
Critical theory
67%
4
Historical analysis
50%

Policy framing

1
Civil rights and anti-discrimination
100%
2
Public accommodations and facilities
50%

Editorial function

Source topics

The diagram distinguishes hierarchy and overlap inferred within this article. It does not assert that all themes are mutually exclusive.

These classifications are inferred from article text and source metadata and remain directly editable. Relationship labels express corpus-analysis judgments, not immutable facts.

Granular comparative context

How “Feminism and gender politics” appears across the Collective corpus

This article was published during the theme’s highest-presence year in the registered corpus (2013).

Relative presence by year

Peak year indexed to 100

2 2006

16 2007

2 2008

3 2009

2 2010

7 2011

9 2012

95 2013

42 2014

19 2015

20 2016

40 2017

7 2018

3 2019

2 2020

3 2021

1 2024

1 2025

Presence by member publication

Frequently co-occurring concepts

Academic framings in this topic

Policy framings in this topic

Values measure relative presence in the registered Collective corpus, not public search interest or public opinion.

Inbound-link tracker

Sources that reference this article

0directly verified links

0provider-confirmed records stored

0best available scholarly cited-by count

0public-web candidates

No individual inbound sources have been stored yet. Counts can still appear when a scholarly index supplies aggregate citation metadata.

Coverage combines internal Collective links, verified Webmentions, curated evidence, supported scholarly indexes, and optional public-web discovery. Search-result candidates remain visibly distinct from directly verified links and provider-confirmed citations. This is not an exhaustive index of the public web or of Google Scholar.

Article authors

Author profiles and related researchers

Admin

112 publications · 0 inbound sources/citations