Collective article record

You might be a TERF if…

Collective Archive Number CAN-0000-0255-10D2 Permanent resolver

I’ve noticed that there seems to be some confusion about what a TERF is so, here’s a quick guide to help you figure out if you’re a TERF. Chances are that you’re a TERF if you believe that you’re a feminist when you… 1.) Claim that transwomen are cismen, that transmen are ciswomen* and purposefully misgender transpeople. 2.) Out transpeople to employers. 3.) Tell trans women their surgery is about supporting rape culture*. 4.) Assert* that lesbian-identified transwomen can’t be lesbian. 5.) Claim that a world without trans people is preferable.1 6.) Find that your anti-trans arguments and the anti-trans arguments of far rightwing groups match.2 7.) Assert cisprivilege isn’t real; that non-trans people aren’t privileged* in a society that’s hostile to trans people. 8.) Claim that gender isn’t real, but the MAAB/FAAB binary is. 9.) Claim that trans surgeries were pioneered by men in service of the patriarchy.3 10.)

The Source Summary reproduces the first 150 words of the source article unless a Collective editor has explicitly locked a replacement.

Interpretive context

Why this article may matter

Community significance

“You might be a TERF if…” may matter to community readers because it preserves a first-person or testimonial account connected to feminism and gender politics, while also engaging transgender identity and history. Such accounts can document how an issue was understood and experienced from within the period or community being discussed.

Historical significance

As a publication record from 2013 at The TERFs, “You might be a TERF if…” provides dated evidence of how feminism and gender politics was being argued in relation to transgender identity and history. Comparing it with earlier and later records can reveal changes in vocabulary, evidence, and emphasis.

Policy significance

The article’s strongest policy connection is public accommodations and facilities. It links that institutional frame to feminism and gender politics and transgender identity and history, making it potentially useful for tracing how an argument moves from description or history into law, regulation, administration, or public practice.

Content analysis

Ranked themes and framings

Rank 1 is the dominant inferred theme or framing. Parent labels identify broader theme families; the relationship diagram distinguishes sub-themes, siblings, overlap, and separate-but-related themes.

Themes

  1. 1
    Feminism and gender politicsTheme family: Power, ideology, and social conflict
    100%
  2. 2
    Transgender identity and historyTheme family: Identity, culture, and community
    60%
  3. 3
    Healthcare and medicineTheme family: Institutions, law, and public life
    26%
  4. 4
    Public policy and governanceTheme family: Institutions, law, and public life
    18%
  5. 5
    Culture, identity, and representationTheme family: Identity, culture, and community
    12%
  6. 6
    Community and organizingTheme family: Identity, culture, and community
    8%

Editorial function

Source topics

Relationship among the ranked article themes Separate but related
Transgender identity and history
Separate but related
Healthcare and medicine
Separate but related
Public policy and governance
Separate but related
Culture, identity, and representation
Separate but related
Community and organizing
Feminism and gender politicsRank 1
The diagram distinguishes hierarchy and overlap inferred within this article. It does not assert that all themes are mutually exclusive.

These classifications are inferred from article text and source metadata and remain directly editable. Relationship labels express corpus-analysis judgments, not immutable facts.

This article was published during the theme’s highest-presence year in the registered corpus (2013).

Relative presence by year

Peak year indexed to 100

Values measure relative presence in the registered Collective corpus, not public search interest or public opinion.

Inbound-link tracker

Sources that reference this article

0directly verified links
0provider-confirmed records stored
0best available scholarly cited-by count
0public-web candidates

No individual inbound sources have been stored yet. Counts can still appear when a scholarly index supplies aggregate citation metadata.

Coverage combines internal Collective links, verified Webmentions, curated evidence, supported scholarly indexes, and optional public-web discovery. Search-result candidates remain visibly distinct from directly verified links and provider-confirmed citations. This is not an exhaustive index of the public web or of Google Scholar.

Article authors

Author profiles and related researchers

Admin

112 publications · 0 inbound sources/citations

Related authors in the Collective corpus

Marian

7 publications · 9 inbound sources/citations

Shares registered themes including Feminism and gender politics, Community and organizing, Violence, safety, and dehumanization.

Autumn Sandeen

57 publications · 17 inbound sources/citations

Shares registered themes including Feminism and gender politics, Community and organizing, Violence, safety, and dehumanization.

TransAdvocate Staff

11 publications · 1 inbound sources/citations

Shares registered themes including Feminism and gender politics, Community and organizing, Violence, safety, and dehumanization.

Cristan

125 publications · 110 inbound sources/citations

Shares registered themes including Feminism and gender politics, Community and organizing, Violence, safety, and dehumanization.

Marti Abernathey

369 publications · 14 inbound sources/citations

Shares registered themes including Feminism and gender politics, Community and organizing, Violence, safety, and dehumanization.

Kat

59 publications · 0 inbound sources/citations

Shares registered themes including Feminism and gender politics, Community and organizing, Violence, safety, and dehumanization.

Related authors are calculated from co-authorship, shared themes and framings, and citation relationships in the registered corpus. This does not imply a personal or institutional association.

Contextual research path

Continue through the Collective

Policy implications

A Cotton Ceiling Conspiracy Rebranding: Super Straight

Examines legal, institutional, or policy consequences connected to the shared theme.

An internal discussion within the trans community, originally known as the Cotton Ceiling, concerned itself with the way physical cisnormative beauty standards impact notions of desirability, how these…

Transadvocate.comCAN-0000-0065-9940
Policy implications

1993: Texas Association for Transsexual Support TG Usage

Examines legal, institutional, or policy consequences connected to the shared theme.

COMMENTARY by [Name Withheld] If ever an effort deserved to be called the tip of the spear, it is the International Conference on Transgender Law and Employment Policy.…

Cristan’s ResearchCAN-0000-0011-FABD
Overview

You might be a TERF if…

Provides broader orientation to the subject and terminology assumed by this article.

I’ve noticed that there seems to be some confusion about what a Trans Exclusionary Radical Feminist (TERF) is so, here’s a quick guide to help you figure out…

Transadvocate.comCAN-0000-0632-6AEA
Counterpoint

VICTORY in Texas: Activism Works!

Offers a critical, contrasting, or corrective interpretation of the shared issue.

The transadvocate recently reported on the efforts of the Texas radical right to derail a proposed LGBT non-discrimination policy in San Antonio. As noted, the proposed ordinance wasn’t…

Transadvocate.comCAN-0000-0644-ACBC