Collective article record

For Matters of Disclosure, I Open Myself To You

Collective Archive Number CAN-0000-1216-F32B Permanent resolver

Source Summary

The post that follows this will discuss Alice Dreger’s “The Controversy Surrounding The Man Who Would Be Queen: A Case History of the Politics of Science, Identity, and Sex in the Internet Age.” As a matter of disclosure, I believe before I can discuss this journal article I must be clear about a few points. 1. I’m not a supporter of Andrea James or Calpernia Addam’s websites. From years of visiting their sites and taking part in their forums, I’ve found that they support a “Stepford Wife” stereotype that many feminists object to. Alice Dreger refers to it as the “feminine essence narrative.” I can’t really speak for anyone else, but this narrative doesn’t fit with my experience. I wasn’t born in the wrong body. I was born in THIS body. My gender identity doesn’t match my biological sex. It isn’t a matter of right or wrong, but of an

The Source Summary reproduces the first 150 words of the source article unless a Collective editor has explicitly locked a replacement.

Read the original article View inbound sources

Interpretive context

Why this article may matter

Community significance

“For Matters of Disclosure, I Open Myself To You” may matter to community readers because it preserves a first-person or testimonial account connected to culture, identity, and representation, while also engaging media, rhetoric, and discourse. Such accounts can document how an issue was understood and experienced from within the period or community being discussed.

Historical significance

The article may have historical value because it explicitly interprets or preserves material concerning culture, identity, and representation. Published in 2007 by Transadvocate.com, it can be read both for the history it describes and as evidence of how media, rhetoric, and discourse was framed at that moment.

Policy significance

No dominant policy frame was detected in “For Matters of Disclosure, I Open Myself To You.” Its policy relevance, when present, is therefore likely indirect: the article’s treatment of culture, identity, and representation may shape later arguments about institutions or public practice rather than proposing a specific rule.

Content analysis

Ranked themes and framings

Rank 1 is the dominant inferred theme or framing. Parent labels identify broader theme families; the relationship key beneath the diagram explains the line styles used for hierarchy, same-family relationships, overlap, and separate-but-related themes.

Themes

1
Culture, identity, and representationTheme family: Identity, culture, and community
100%
2
Media, rhetoric, and discourseTheme family: Knowledge, history, and communication
89%
3
History, archives, and memoryTheme family: Knowledge, history, and communication
83%
4
Transgender identity and historyTheme family: Identity, culture, and community
67%
5
Sex and gender classificationTheme family: Power, ideology, and social conflict
67%
6
Science, evidence, and expertiseTheme family: Knowledge, history, and communication
67%

Academic framing

1
Media and discourse analysis
100%
2
Historical analysis
94%

Editorial function

Source topics

Relationship key

Overlapping themes

The diagram distinguishes hierarchy, same-family relationships, overlap, and separate-but-related themes inferred within this article. It does not assert that all themes are mutually exclusive.

These classifications are inferred from article text and source metadata and remain directly editable. Relationship labels express corpus-analysis judgments, not immutable facts.

Granular comparative context

How “Culture, identity, and representation” appears across the Collective corpus

This article appeared 6 year(s) before the theme reached its highest annual presence in the registered corpus in 2013.

Relative presence by year

Peak year indexed to 100

1 2004

3 2005

5 2006

50 2007

29 2008

29 2009

6 2010

55 2011

56 2012

92 2013

53 2014

15 2015

9 2016

10 2017

13 2018

4 2019

2 2020

2 2021

1 2024

1 2025

Presence by member publication

Frequently co-occurring concepts

Academic framings in this topic

Policy framings in this topic

Values measure relative presence in the registered Collective corpus, not public search interest or public opinion.

Inbound-link and citation evidence

Documented circulation and reception

No broad reception evidence has been documented yet; this may reflect unconfigured or incomplete indexes rather than an absence of circulation. These observations describe circulation and reuse; they do not assign cultural worth or evaluate the communities, arguments, or people discussed.

0distinct source records documented

0distinct referring domains

0best available scholarly cited-by count

0books or volumes documented

0references retained by the source publication

—observed years in dated evidence

Evidence by channel

Independent counts; bars are not additive

No channel totals are available yet.

Coverage of the evidence search

Shows what has actually been checked

Publisher-held referencesChecked · August 24, 2026

Scholarly indexesChecked · August 24, 2026

Book and volume searchNotchecked

Public-web searchNotconfigured

Collective corpus linksIndexed · August 31, 2026

Review scholarly results Review book results Review public-web results

No individual references have been stored yet. This can mean that source-held pingbacks have not been imported, provider access is not configured, or available indexes do not expose this work in a machine-readable form.

Counts describe documented circulation and reception in the sources currently available to the Collective. They are not a score of quality, merit, popularity, or social value, and provider totals can overlap.

Article authors

Author profiles and related researchers

Marti Abernathey

369 publications · 249 inbound sources/citations