Collective article record

#DiscoSexology Part II: The Timeline

Collective Archive Number CAN-0000-0361-AE8D Permanent resolver

Source Summary

Disco Sexology, Part One: Introduction Disco Sexology, Part Three: Controversy By Cristan Williams Listen to this article* Upon completion of this series, this work will be released, in its entirety, as both an audio and ebook. Installment Preface Welcome to the second installment in this series on the rise and fall of Disco Sexology. This article will provide a concise, yet comprehensive review of the way Disco Sexology rose in prominence, eventually defining the way trans and gender expansive people were pathologized as having the same mental illness: a “gender identity disorder.” Additionally, this historical account will track the rise of the critique of Disco Sexology’s metrics, beginning with feminist critiques of conflating gender role discomfort with gender dysphoria in the 1970s. Jump to History Intro to the #Disco Sexology Series With the recent enthusiastic promotion of disco-era ideas about trans people and gender identity in general, the TransAdvocate felt

The Source Summary reproduces the first 150 words of the source article unless a Collective editor has explicitly locked a replacement.

Read the original article View inbound sources

Interpretive context

Why this article may matter

Community significance

“#DiscoSexology Part II: The Timeline” may matter to community readers because it preserves a first-person or testimonial account connected to transgender identity and history, while also engaging healthcare and medicine. Such accounts can document how an issue was understood and experienced from within the period or community being discussed.

Historical significance

The article may have historical value because it explicitly interprets or preserves material concerning transgender identity and history. Published in 2017 by Transadvocate.com, it can be read both for the history it describes and as evidence of how healthcare and medicine was framed at that moment.

Policy significance

“#DiscoSexology Part II: The Timeline” discusses institutions, law, or governance in connection with transgender identity and history. Even without a dominant policy classification, the article may help researchers identify practical consequences for healthcare and medicine.

Content analysis

Ranked themes and framings

Rank 1 is the dominant inferred theme or framing. Parent labels identify broader theme families; the relationship key beneath the diagram explains the line styles used for hierarchy, same-family relationships, overlap, and separate-but-related themes.

Themes

1
Transgender identity and historyTheme family: Identity, culture, and community
100%
2
Healthcare and medicineTheme family: Institutions, law, and public life
57%
3
History, archives, and memoryTheme family: Knowledge, history, and communication
57%
4
Education and youthTheme family: Institutions, law, and public life
54%
5
Science, evidence, and expertiseTheme family: Knowledge, history, and communication
44%
6
Family and relationshipsTheme family: Identity, culture, and community
26%

Academic framing

1
Clinical and medical analysis
100%
2
Historical analysis
86%
3
Philosophical and ontological analysis
61%
4
Psychological analysis
59%

Editorial function

Source topics

Relationship key

Separate but related themes
Related theme in the same family

The diagram distinguishes hierarchy, same-family relationships, overlap, and separate-but-related themes inferred within this article. It does not assert that all themes are mutually exclusive.

These classifications are inferred from article text and source metadata and remain directly editable. Relationship labels express corpus-analysis judgments, not immutable facts.

Granular comparative context

How “Transgender identity and history” appears across the Collective corpus

This article appeared 4 year(s) after the theme’s highest annual presence in the registered corpus in 2013.

Relative presence by year

Peak year indexed to 100

5 2004

11 2005

4 2006

90 2007

64 2008

47 2009

14 2010

130 2011

112 2012

240 2013

126 2014

33 2015

28 2016

50 2017

41 2018

15 2019

2 2020

4 2021

2 2024

1 2025

Presence by member publication

Frequently co-occurring concepts

Academic framings in this topic

Policy framings in this topic

Values measure relative presence in the registered Collective corpus, not public search interest or public opinion.

Inbound-link and citation evidence

Documented circulation and reception

The documented sources span 1 domain; the strongest available scholarly index reports 78 citing works. The dated evidence currently spans 2000–2024. These observations describe circulation and reuse; they do not assign cultural worth or evaluate the communities, arguments, or people discussed.

76distinct source records documented

1distinct referring domains

78best available scholarly cited-by count

0books or volumes documented

0references retained by the source publication

2000–2024observed years in dated evidence

Evidence by channel

Independent counts; bars are not additive

Scholarly citing works78

Coverage of the evidence search

Shows what has actually been checked

Publisher-held referencesChecked · August 31, 2026

Scholarly indexesChecked · August 31, 2026

Book and volume searchNotchecked

Public-web searchNotconfigured

Collective corpus linksIndexed · August 31, 2026

69 Crossref78 OpenCitations

Review scholarly results Review book results Review public-web results

Documented references over time

Yearly scholarly series: OpenCitations, combined with dated non-scholarly evidence

4 2000

4 2001

2 2002

12 2003

1 2004

3 2005

4 2006

3 2007

4 2008

6 2009

1 2010

2 2011

1 2012

3 2013

4 2014

2 2015

3 2016

1 2017

3 2018

2 2019

4 2020

1 2021

2 2022

2 2023

2 2024