So SPLC, When Are You Going To Declare The TERF’s A Hate Group?
And how many more Black and Latina trans women have to die before you do so? How many more transpeople have to suffer from anti-trans discrimination before you step up to the plate and do what you should have done years ago? How much more hate speech do they have to publish online at RadFem Hub and Gender Trender before you call them on it? You have four decades worth of evidence that point out the TERF’s are a hate group. Even Stevie Wonder can see they are a hate group. The trans community who is deleteriously affected by their rabid hate damned sure knows it. So why haven’t you as the FBI’s go to watchdog group for keeping an eye on the extremist ones in this country not done your due diligence on trans exterminationalist exclusionary radical feminism? Your continued inaction and silence on this issue only lends credence
The Source Summary reproduces the first 150 words of the source article unless a Collective editor has explicitly locked a replacement.
Why this article may matter
Community significance
“So SPLC, When Are You Going To Declare The TERF’s A Hate Group?” may matter to community readers because it preserves a first-person or testimonial account connected to feminism and gender politics, while also engaging law and civil rights. Such accounts can document how an issue was understood and experienced from within the period or community being discussed.
Historical significance
As a publication record from 2013 at Transadvocate.com, “So SPLC, When Are You Going To Declare The TERF’s A Hate Group?” provides dated evidence of how feminism and gender politics was being argued in relation to law and civil rights. Comparing it with earlier and later records can reveal changes in vocabulary, evidence, and emphasis.
Policy significance
“So SPLC, When Are You Going To Declare The TERF’s A Hate Group?” discusses institutions, law, or governance in connection with feminism and gender politics. Even without a dominant policy classification, the article may help researchers identify practical consequences for law and civil rights.
Ranked themes and framings
Rank 1 is the dominant inferred theme or framing. Parent labels identify broader theme families; the relationship key beneath the diagram explains the line styles used for hierarchy, same-family relationships, overlap, and separate-but-related themes.
Themes
- 1Feminism and gender politicsTheme family: Power, ideology, and social conflict100%
- 2Law and civil rightsTheme family: Institutions, law, and public life27%
- 3Science, evidence, and expertiseTheme family: Knowledge, history, and communication27%
- 4Transgender identity and historyTheme family: Identity, culture, and community18%
- 5Community and organizingTheme family: Identity, culture, and community18%
- 6Race and intersectionalityTheme family: Power, ideology, and social conflict9%
Academic framing
- 1100%
Editorial function
Source topics
- Separate but related themes
- Related theme in the same family
These classifications are inferred from article text and source metadata and remain directly editable. Relationship labels express corpus-analysis judgments, not immutable facts.
How “Feminism and gender politics” appears across the Collective corpus
This article was published during the theme’s highest-presence year in the registered corpus (2013).
Relative presence by year
Peak year indexed to 100Presence by member publication
Frequently co-occurring concepts
- Transgender identity and history198
- Community and organizing165
- Violence, safety, and dehumanization117
- Media, rhetoric, and discourse80
- Law and civil rights74
- Culture, identity, and representation73
- Education and youth58
- Healthcare and medicine55
- History, archives, and memory44
- Science, evidence, and expertise37
Academic framings in this topic
Values measure relative presence in the registered Collective corpus, not public search interest or public opinion.
Documented circulation and reception
5 source-held references record early links or citations; the documented sources span 2 distinct domains. The dated evidence currently falls in 2013. These observations describe circulation and reuse; they do not assign cultural worth or evaluate the communities, arguments, or people discussed.
Evidence by channel
Independent counts; bars are not additiveCoverage of the evidence search
Shows what has actually been checkedDocumented references over time
Dated source evidence currently stored by the Collective@RealityPhobia
RT @jaspergregory: So SPLC, When Are You Going To Declare The TERF's A Hate Group?: http://t.co/yTHcgMzoFC #StupidShitQueeriosSay
Perhaps the SPLC Should Just Be Honest and Admit that it is Fine With Hate When it is Directed at Trans Women By Self-Declared…
[...] Monica Roberts asks at TransAdvocate: [...]
@burkelyh
RT @jaspergregory: So SPLC, When Are You Going To Declare The TERF's A Hate Group?: http://t.co/Xh2AMpjl5O
@myprideblog
RT @AutumnSandeen: Via @transadvocate: So SPLC, When Are You Going To Declare The TERF’s A Hate Group? http://t.co/D2pTHZKv7W #trans #lgbtqia
Alicia (@Artemissian)
RT @AutumnSandeen: Via @transadvocate: So SPLC, When Are You Going To Declare The TERF’s A Hate Group? http://t.co/D2pTHZKv7W #trans #lgbtqia
Counts describe documented circulation and reception in the sources currently available to the Collective. They are not a score of quality, merit, popularity, or social value, and provider totals can overlap.
Author profiles and related researchers
Related authors in the Collective corpus
Cristan Williams
Shares registered themes including Transgender identity and history, Community and organizing, Law and civil rights.
Admin
Shares registered themes including Transgender identity and history, Community and organizing, Law and civil rights.
Cristan Williams
Shares registered themes including Transgender identity and history, Community and organizing, Law and civil rights.
Cooke
Shares registered themes including Transgender identity and history, Community and organizing, Law and civil rights.
Autumn Sandeen
Shares registered themes including Transgender identity and history, Community and organizing, Law and civil rights.
Gwen Smith
Shares registered themes including Transgender identity and history, Community and organizing, Law and civil rights.
Related authors are calculated from co-authorship, shared themes and framings, and citation relationships in the registered corpus. This does not imply a personal or institutional association.
Continue through the Collective
1917 – 1999: “Ambisextrous” Review
Approaches the shared subject through a related analytical or disciplinary frame.
The trans community continues to create words in order to capture the nuances of cultural gender roles, our physical sex and the entire experience of transitioning. Developing terminology…
“Being Feminist” and Their Transphobia Problem
Provides a contextually related perspective from elsewhere in the Collective.
*Disclaimer* This post is on a site exposing TERFs but we are not insinuating that Being Feminists are part of that group. UPDATE: LA has apologized for and…
Tipping Point On RadFem Transphobia?
Approaches the shared subject through a related analytical or disciplinary frame.
The British Transphobic Feminist Troika unleashed their hate speech upon the world last week probably thinking they would get pushback from the trans community they and their acolytes…
Naming the problem
Approaches the shared subject through a related analytical or disciplinary frame.
What follows are the words of a cisgender feminist who can no longer not name the problem: I suppose in the past I’ve avoided, for the most part,…