Collective article record

TERF Hate Sites

Collective Archive Number CAN-0000-0336-D81F Permanent resolver

Source Summary

Warning! Many of these sites track trans people and their allies and are known to dox people, contact your employer, harass the people you know and even contact your medical provider. If you choose to visit asterisk sites, please consider utilizing the Tor Project. It will protect your IP address from those who are actively trying to use it for harassment. Trigger Warning! Extreme Transphobia You will need to copy and paste the URL into your Tor Browser pretendbians.com gendertrender.wordpress.com bevjoradicallesbian.wordpress.com cherryblossomlife.com fabmatters.wordpress.com sexnotgender.com transgendertropes.wordpress.com bugbrennan.com twanzphobic.wordpress.com radicalfeministmemes.wordpress.com privilegedenyingtranny.wordpress.com genderfatigue.com twitter.com/TheLesbianMafia thelesbianmafia.tumblr.com *more later* 0

The Source Summary reproduces the first 150 words of the source article unless a Collective editor has explicitly locked a replacement.

Read the original article View inbound sources

Interpretive context

Why this article may matter

Community significance

“TERF Hate Sites” may matter to community readers because it records a specific intervention in debates about feminism and gender politics, with particular attention to transgender identity and history. The permanent record makes that intervention easier to locate and compare with other Collective coverage.

Historical significance

As a publication record from 2013 at The TERFs, “TERF Hate Sites” provides dated evidence of how feminism and gender politics was being argued in relation to transgender identity and history. Comparing it with earlier and later records can reveal changes in vocabulary, evidence, and emphasis.

Policy significance

No dominant policy frame was detected in “TERF Hate Sites.” Its policy relevance, when present, is therefore likely indirect: the article’s treatment of feminism and gender politics may shape later arguments about institutions or public practice rather than proposing a specific rule.

Content analysis

Ranked themes and framings

Rank 1 is the dominant inferred theme or framing. Parent labels identify broader theme families; the relationship key beneath the diagram explains the line styles used for hierarchy, same-family relationships, overlap, and separate-but-related themes.

Themes

1
Feminism and gender politicsTheme family: Power, ideology, and social conflict
100%
2
Transgender identity and historyTheme family: Identity, culture, and community
53%
3
Healthcare and medicineTheme family: Institutions, law, and public life
53%
4
Violence, safety, and dehumanizationTheme family: Power, ideology, and social conflict
53%

Academic framing

1
Clinical and medical analysis
100%

Editorial function

Source topics

Relationship key

Separate but related themes
Overlapping themes

The diagram distinguishes hierarchy, same-family relationships, overlap, and separate-but-related themes inferred within this article. It does not assert that all themes are mutually exclusive.

These classifications are inferred from article text and source metadata and remain directly editable. Relationship labels express corpus-analysis judgments, not immutable facts.

Granular comparative context

How “Feminism and gender politics” appears across the Collective corpus

This article was published during the theme’s highest-presence year in the registered corpus (2013).

Relative presence by year

Peak year indexed to 100

2 2006

16 2007

2 2008

3 2009

2 2010

7 2011

9 2012

94 2013

44 2014

21 2015

21 2016

43 2017

7 2018

3 2019

3 2020

3 2021

1 2024

1 2025

Presence by member publication

Frequently co-occurring concepts

Academic framings in this topic

Policy framings in this topic

Values measure relative presence in the registered Collective corpus, not public search interest or public opinion.

Inbound-link and citation evidence

Documented circulation and reception

No broad reception evidence has been documented yet; this may reflect unconfigured or incomplete indexes rather than an absence of circulation. These observations describe circulation and reuse; they do not assign cultural worth or evaluate the communities, arguments, or people discussed.

0distinct source records documented

0distinct referring domains

0best available scholarly cited-by count

0books or volumes documented

0references retained by the source publication

—observed years in dated evidence

Evidence by channel

Independent counts; bars are not additive

No channel totals are available yet.

Coverage of the evidence search

Shows what has actually been checked

Publisher-held referencesChecked · August 31, 2026

Scholarly indexesChecked · August 31, 2026

Book and volume searchNotchecked

Public-web searchNotconfigured

Collective corpus linksIndexed · August 31, 2026

Review scholarly results Review book results Review public-web results

No individual references have been stored yet. This can mean that source-held pingbacks have not been imported, provider access is not configured, or available indexes do not expose this work in a machine-readable form.

Counts describe documented circulation and reception in the sources currently available to the Collective. They are not a score of quality, merit, popularity, or social value, and provider totals can overlap.

Article authors

Author profiles and related researchers

Cristan Williams

143 publications · 714 inbound sources/citations

Related authors in the Collective corpus

Cristan Williams

319 publications · 3,580 inbound sources/citations

Connected through 8 citation links between registered publications. Shares registered themes including Transgender identity and history, Culture, identity, and representation, Healthcare and medicine.