This is the end… to burnout!
Today’s show focuses on self-care as a form of Resistance, plus the local and national news and Gwen Smith’s Gender Nation. On the Pod: Cristan Williams, Robin Mack, and Alexis Melvin. Music: Whole Cloth by Daniel Birch & Ben Pegley & The End by The Doors Parade Subscribe to the TransAdvocate Podcasts and Audio Essays here: iTunes Google Play Soundcloud PlayerFM Stitcher Here’s more information on events and issues covered in this podcast: Topics: CDC’s “banning” of 7 words from CDC budget: “Kelly told the analysts that ‘certain words’ in the CDC’s budget drafts were being sent back to the agency for correction. Three words that had been flagged in these drafts were ‘vulnerable,’ ‘entitlement’ and ‘diversity.’ Kelly told the group the ban on the other words had been conveyed verbally.” Peer-Reviewed Study – The Chilling Effect: How Do Researchers React to Controversy? ‘Moral’ Pedophiles and rapists: Catholic Priest &
The Source Summary reproduces the first 150 words of the source article unless a Collective editor has explicitly locked a replacement.
Why this article may matter
Community significance
“This is the end… to burnout!” may matter to community readers because it preserves a first-person or testimonial account connected to transgender identity and history, while also engaging education and youth. Such accounts can document how an issue was understood and experienced from within the period or community being discussed.
Historical significance
The article may have historical value because it explicitly interprets or preserves material concerning transgender identity and history. Published in 2017 by Transadvocate.com, it can be read both for the history it describes and as evidence of how education and youth was framed at that moment.
Policy significance
The article’s strongest policy connection is elections and democratic governance. It links that institutional frame to transgender identity and history and education and youth, making it potentially useful for tracing how an argument moves from description or history into law, regulation, administration, or public practice.
Ranked themes and framings
Rank 1 is the dominant inferred theme or framing. Parent labels identify broader theme families; the relationship key beneath the diagram explains the line styles used for hierarchy, same-family relationships, overlap, and separate-but-related themes.
Themes
- 1Transgender identity and historyTheme family: Identity, culture, and community100%
- 2Education and youthTheme family: Institutions, law, and public life69%
- 3Science, evidence, and expertiseTheme family: Knowledge, history, and communication62%
- 4Religion and moralityTheme family: Power, ideology, and social conflict62%
- 5Violence, safety, and dehumanizationTheme family: Power, ideology, and social conflict46%
- 6History, archives, and memoryTheme family: Knowledge, history, and communication46%
Academic framing
- 1100%
Policy framing
- 1100%
Editorial function
Source topics
- Overlapping themes
- Separate but related themes
These classifications are inferred from article text and source metadata and remain directly editable. Relationship labels express corpus-analysis judgments, not immutable facts.
How “Transgender identity and history” appears across the Collective corpus
This article appeared 4 year(s) after the theme’s highest annual presence in the registered corpus in 2013.
Relative presence by year
Peak year indexed to 100Presence by member publication
Frequently co-occurring concepts
- Community and organizing531
- Law and civil rights468
- Culture, identity, and representation320
- Education and youth308
- Media, rhetoric, and discourse260
- Healthcare and medicine248
- Violence, safety, and dehumanization238
- History, archives, and memory216
- Public policy and governance206
- Feminism and gender politics198
Academic framings in this topic
Policy framings in this topic
- Public accommodations and facilities177
- Civil rights and anti-discrimination173
- Criminal justice and public safety131
- Elections and democratic governance100
- Research ethics and data governance78
- Labor and employment policy52
- Administrative classification and identity documents39
- Housing and social services38
Values measure relative presence in the registered Collective corpus, not public search interest or public opinion.
Documented circulation and reception
The documented sources span 1 domain; the strongest available scholarly index reports 63 citing works. The dated evidence currently spans 2008–2025. These observations describe circulation and reuse; they do not assign cultural worth or evaluate the communities, arguments, or people discussed.
Evidence by channel
Independent counts; bars are not additiveCoverage of the evidence search
Shows what has actually been checkedDocumented references over time
Yearly scholarly series: OpenCitations, combined with dated non-scholarly evidenceDOI 10.1080/0969160x.2025.2546882
P16Y9M7D
DOI 10.2105/ajph.2024.307913
P16Y3M
DOI 10.1093/law/9780197768990.003.0010
P15Y11M14D
DOI 10.1093/law/9780197768990.002.0012
P15Y11M14D
DOI 10.1093/law/9780197768990.002.0011
P15Y11M14D
DOI 10.1093/law/9780197768990.003.0004
P15Y11M14D
DOI 10.1093/law/9780197768990.003.0005
P15Y11M14D
DOI 10.1093/law/9780197768990.002.0014
P15Y11M14D
DOI 10.1093/law/9780197768990.003.0011
P15Y11M14D
DOI 10.1093/law/9780197768990.002.0010
P15Y11M14D
DOI 10.1093/law/9780197768990.003.0002
P15Y11M14D
DOI 10.1093/law/9780197768990.001.0001
P15Y11M14D
Show 51 additional documented sources
DOI 10.1093/law/9780197768990.003.0006
P15Y11M14D
DOI 10.1093/law/9780197768990.003.0008
P15Y11M14D
DOI 10.1093/law/9780197768990.003.0003
P15Y11M14D
DOI 10.1093/law/9780197768990.003.0001
P15Y11M14D
DOI 10.1093/law/9780197768990.002.0004
P15Y11M14D
DOI 10.1093/law/9780197768990.003.0013
P15Y11M14D
DOI 10.1093/law/9780197768990.002.0003
P15Y11M14D
DOI 10.1093/law/9780197768990.003.0012
P15Y11M14D
DOI 10.1093/law/9780197768990.002.0008
P15Y11M14D
DOI 10.1093/law/9780197768990.002.0005
P15Y11M14D
DOI 10.1093/law/9780197768990.003.0009
P15Y11M14D
DOI 10.1093/law/9780197768990.002.0007
P15Y11M14D
DOI 10.1093/law/9780197768990.002.0013
P15Y11M14D
DOI 10.1093/law/9780197768990.003.0007
P15Y11M14D
DOI 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25043
P15Y2M
DOI 10.1007/978-3-031-39330-3_3
P14Y
DOI 10.2298/tem2202155e
P13Y
DOI 10.1007/s11024-022-09479-4
P13Y11M14D
DOI 10.1007/s10730-022-09479-7
P13Y6M1D
DOI 10.1177/03063127221093397
P13Y5M17D
DOI 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2021.100922
P13Y4M
DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-53857-6_13
P12Y
DOI 10.1177/0162243920978303
P12Y0M21D
DOI 10.1080/1461670x.2020.1758956
P11Y5M25D
DOI 10.33225/jbse/19.18.793
P10Y10M24D
DOI 10.2196/15298
P10Y9M25D
DOI 10.2196/preprints.15298
P10Y7M10D
DOI 10.1162/posc_a_00277
P9Y6M
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0196545
P9Y5M21D
DOI 10.1080/09540121.2018.1447078
P9Y3M18D
DOI 10.1111/disa.12237
P8Y5M29D
DOI 10.1007/978-981-287-098-8_30
P7Y
DOI 10.1080/00224499.2016.1255872
P8Y1M5D
DOI 10.1038/nm.4111
P7Y5M
DOI 10.1007/978-981-287-079-7_30-2
P6Y
DOI 10.1007/978-981-287-079-7_30-1
P6Y
DOI 10.1080/08109028.2016.1168202
P6Y9M14D
DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.04.006
P6Y7M
DOI 10.1016/j.rhm.2015.06.008
P6Y1M
DOI 10.1016/j.rhm.2015.07.026
P6Y1M
DOI 10.1186/2193-1801-3-307
P5Y7M6D
DOI 10.1177/1049731514533731
P5Y6M16D
DOI 10.2105/ajph.2013.301501
P5Y2M
DOI 10.1080/19371918.2013.774667
P4Y5M
DOI 10.1002/hast.143
P4Y2M19D
DOI 10.1080/1743727x.2012.754006
P4Y1M0D
DOI 10.1111/j.1573-7861.2011.01259.x
P2Y8M21D
DOI 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2009.00144.x
P0Y10M
DOI 10.1242/dmm.002352
P0Y1M20D
DOI 10.1038/nm0109-5b
P0Y1M
DOI 10.1038/news.2008.1234
P0Y0M0D
Counts describe documented circulation and reception in the sources currently available to the Collective. They are not a score of quality, merit, popularity, or social value, and provider totals can overlap.
Author profiles and related researchers
Related authors in the Collective corpus
Related authors are calculated from co-authorship, shared themes and framings, and citation relationships in the registered corpus. This does not imply a personal or institutional association.
Continue through the Collective
We answer your questions
Offers a critical, contrasting, or corrective interpretation of the shared issue.
It turns out that basically everyone running the anti-trans campaign against Houston’s equal right’s ordinance is a sexual harasser, pedophile, or sex abuse apologist. Also, we answer your…
Recognizing the Right Wing Playbook
Examines legal, institutional, or policy consequences connected to the shared theme.
While we’ve seen it before, we sometimes don’t see the political forest for the trees. The TransAdvocate crew reviews both local and national news and Dr. Gillian Frank…
Fear and our Future
Examines legal, institutional, or policy consequences connected to the shared theme.
Today’s show focuses on dealing with fear, both personally and as a community. Moreover, we present an audio essay performance piece titled The Real Housewives of Gilead: The…
Podcast: Community, Transition, & Standards of Realness
Examines a closely shared theme in greater detail or with a more specialized framing.
The podcast crew reviews national and local politics and discusses some of the nuances of community, transition, and detransition. Also featured: the first installment of Gwen Smith’s Gender…