1991: Accusation of Stealing Virginia Prince’s Word by ‘Incorrigible Texans’
Gender Euphoria, January 1992, Vol VI, No 1 November 12, 1991 Dear Editor, It was with a great deal of interest that I read Virginia Prince’s letter and your response in the November issue of GE. As a self-taught writer and a cross-dresser, two of my favorite forms of expression were stimulated. While I agree with your assertion that male and female are indeed properly used (in the current context of the language as defined by dictionaries) as both nouns and adjectives (sorry Godmother), I believe Virginia’s point is still valid to a degree. The degree being the distinction, as you referenced in your concurrence, between biological sex and cultural gender. Part of our Godmother’s crusade is to sever the assumed connection between sex (as a biological noun) from gender (a cultural noun). Further, she is the pioneer in severing the assumed connection that if you cross a gender classification,
The Source Summary reproduces the first 150 words of the source article unless a Collective editor has explicitly locked a replacement.
Why this article may matter
Community significance
“1991: Accusation of Stealing Virginia Prince’s Word by ‘Incorrigible Texans’” may matter to community readers because it preserves a first-person or testimonial account connected to sex and gender classification, while also engaging community and organizing. Such accounts can document how an issue was understood and experienced from within the period or community being discussed.
Historical significance
The article may have historical value because it explicitly interprets or preserves material concerning sex and gender classification. Published in 2012 by Cristan’s Research, it can be read both for the history it describes and as evidence of how community and organizing was framed at that moment.
Policy significance
No dominant policy frame was detected in “1991: Accusation of Stealing Virginia Prince’s Word by ‘Incorrigible Texans’.” Its policy relevance, when present, is therefore likely indirect: the article’s treatment of sex and gender classification may shape later arguments about institutions or public practice rather than proposing a specific rule.
Ranked themes and framings
Rank 1 is the dominant inferred theme or framing. Parent labels identify broader theme families; the relationship key beneath the diagram explains the line styles used for hierarchy, same-family relationships, overlap, and separate-but-related themes.
Themes
- 1Sex and gender classificationTheme family: Power, ideology, and social conflict100%
- 2Community and organizingTheme family: Identity, culture, and community36%
- 3Transgender identity and historyTheme family: Identity, culture, and community24%
- 4Culture, identity, and representationTheme family: Identity, culture, and community22%
- 5Media, rhetoric, and discourseTheme family: Knowledge, history, and communication16%
- 6History, archives, and memoryTheme family: Knowledge, history, and communication13%
Academic framing
- 1100%
- 267%
Editorial function
Source topics
- Separate but related themes
These classifications are inferred from article text and source metadata and remain directly editable. Relationship labels express corpus-analysis judgments, not immutable facts.
How “Sex and gender classification” appears across the Collective corpus
This article was published during the theme’s highest-presence year in the registered corpus (2012).
Relative presence by year
Peak year indexed to 100Presence by member publication
Frequently co-occurring concepts
Academic framings in this topic
Policy framings in this topic
Values measure relative presence in the registered Collective corpus, not public search interest or public opinion.
Documented circulation and reception
1 source-held reference records an early link or citation; the documented sources span 1 domain. These observations describe circulation and reuse; they do not assign cultural worth or evaluate the communities, arguments, or people discussed.
Evidence by channel
Independent counts; bars are not additiveCoverage of the evidence search
Shows what has actually been checkedThe Virginia Prince Fountainhead Narrative Must Die! | Ehipassiko
Pingback: The Virginia Prince Fountainhead Narrative Must Die! | Ehipassiko
Counts describe documented circulation and reception in the sources currently available to the Collective. They are not a score of quality, merit, popularity, or social value, and provider totals can overlap.
Author profiles and related researchers
Related authors in the Collective corpus
Related authors are calculated from co-authorship, shared themes and framings, and citation relationships in the registered corpus. This does not imply a personal or institutional association.
Continue through the Collective
Faggot Ru Paul: trannys need to “get stronger”
Approaches the shared subject through a related analytical or disciplinary frame.
The faggot, RuPaul Andre Charles, claims that trans people are “bitches” who need to “get stronger” with regard to his use of tranny. In an interview on WTF…
Transgender*: The Rhetorical Landscape of a Term
Provides a contextually related perspective from elsewhere in the Collective.
The following is a peer-reviewed paper originally published in Present Tense: A Journal of Rhetoric in Society. The article was co-authored by the TransAdvocate Editor, Cristan Williams and…
Tranny: An Evidence-Based Review
Adds research, documentation, or primary-source context.
“Tranny” seems to be a contentious term within the GLBT community. For many in the trans community, we’ve known “tranny” to be a term associated with the gay…
1993: The Life and Times of a Gender Outlaw: An Interview with Leslie Feinberg
Provides a contextually related perspective from elsewhere in the Collective.
Twenty years ago, a now defunct trans newsletter captured a really interesting moment in trans history: a linguistic tipping point. As I’ve noted: “Transgender” has been around since…