Collective article record

Misogyny, it’s not just for breakfast anymore.

Collective Archive Number CAN-0000-0726-F2C9 Permanent resolver

Source Summary

Recently I came across an interesting story in my newsfeed. It seems Sir Richard Branson, of Virgin Air lost a wager to Air Asia Group CEO Tony Fernandes. Sir Branson bet Mr Fernandes over whose Formula 1 team would be ranked higher in the 2010 Championships. Branson lost the contest and as a result, he must serve as flight attendant on AirAsia’s Perth to Kuala Lumpur flight. It all seems a bit of fun. The proceeds from the flight go to charity. However, there is something less charitable to all of this. Sir Richard’s shame is complete, only after he dons a dress. Rock icon Iggy Pop has posed for photos in a dress which have been turned into an internet meme. That meme intended to cast off the negativity of being a woman. Yet all too often it’s the other way around. While the Iggy Pop meme has not

The Source Summary reproduces the first 150 words of the source article unless a Collective editor has explicitly locked a replacement.

Read the original article View inbound sources

Interpretive context

Why this article may matter

Community significance

“Misogyny, it’s not just for breakfast anymore.” may matter to community readers because it preserves a first-person or testimonial account connected to technology, data, and platforms, while also engaging transgender identity and history. Such accounts can document how an issue was understood and experienced from within the period or community being discussed.

Historical significance

As a publication record from 2013 at Transadvocate.com, “Misogyny, it’s not just for breakfast anymore.” provides dated evidence of how technology, data, and platforms was being argued in relation to transgender identity and history. Comparing it with earlier and later records can reveal changes in vocabulary, evidence, and emphasis.

Policy significance

No dominant policy frame was detected in “Misogyny, it’s not just for breakfast anymore..” Its policy relevance, when present, is therefore likely indirect: the article’s treatment of technology, data, and platforms may shape later arguments about institutions or public practice rather than proposing a specific rule.

Content analysis

Ranked themes and framings

Rank 1 is the dominant inferred theme or framing. Parent labels identify broader theme families; the relationship key beneath the diagram explains the line styles used for hierarchy, same-family relationships, overlap, and separate-but-related themes.

Themes

1
Technology, data, and platformsTheme family: Knowledge, history, and communication
100%
2
Transgender identity and historyTheme family: Identity, culture, and community
38%

Academic framing

1
Interpretive analysis
100%

Editorial function

Source topics

Relationship key

Separate but related themes

The diagram distinguishes hierarchy, same-family relationships, overlap, and separate-but-related themes inferred within this article. It does not assert that all themes are mutually exclusive.

These classifications are inferred from article text and source metadata and remain directly editable. Relationship labels express corpus-analysis judgments, not immutable facts.

Granular comparative context

How “Technology, data, and platforms” appears across the Collective corpus

This article was published during the theme’s highest-presence year in the registered corpus (2013).

Relative presence by year

Peak year indexed to 100

1 2005

2 2007

3 2008

3 2009

9 2011

2 2012

13 2013

8 2014

3 2015

3 2016

3 2017

6 2018

5 2019

1 2021

Presence by member publication

Frequently co-occurring concepts

Academic framings in this topic

Policy framings in this topic

Values measure relative presence in the registered Collective corpus, not public search interest or public opinion.

Inbound-link and citation evidence

Documented circulation and reception

5 source-held references record early links or citations; the documented sources span 1 domain. These observations describe circulation and reuse; they do not assign cultural worth or evaluate the communities, arguments, or people discussed.

5distinct source records documented

1distinct referring domains

0best available scholarly cited-by count

0books or volumes documented

5references retained by the source publication

—observed years in dated evidence

Evidence by channel

Independent counts; bars are not additive

Source-held references5

Coverage of the evidence search

Shows what has actually been checked

Publisher-held referencesChecked · August 31, 2026

Scholarly indexesChecked · August 31, 2026

Book and volume searchNotchecked

Public-web searchNotconfigured

Collective corpus linksIndexed · August 31, 2026

Review scholarly results Review book results Review public-web results

Reference retained by the source publicationSource-publication recordProvider-confirmed

Autumn Sandeen (@AutumnSandeen)

twitter.com

Pingback: Autumn Sandeen (@AutumnSandeen)

Reference retained by the source publicationSource-publication recordProvider-confirmed

Emet Tauber (@Rememberandhope)

twitter.com

Pingback: Emet Tauber (@Rememberandhope)

Reference retained by the source publicationSource-publication recordProvider-confirmed

Raven Xanadu (@wyldraven)

twitter.com

Pingback: Raven Xanadu (@wyldraven)

Reference retained by the source publicationSource-publication recordProvider-confirmed

Transmuseplanet (@sabrina_samone)

twitter.com

Pingback: Transmuseplanet (@sabrina_samone)

Reference retained by the source publicationSource-publication recordProvider-confirmed

@kellibusey

twitter.com

Pingback: @kellibusey

Counts describe documented circulation and reception in the sources currently available to the Collective. They are not a score of quality, merit, popularity, or social value, and provider totals can overlap.

Article authors

Author profiles and related researchers

Jenna

7 publications · 5 inbound sources/citations