Collective article record

AB1266: Privacy For All Students and “San Francisco Values”

Collective Archive Number CAN-0000-0542-18C3 Permanent resolver

Source Summary

Save me, Lord, from lying lips and from deceitful tongues. Psalm 120:2 The Pacific Justice Institute (CRI) stated in their Letter to the principal of Florence High School (dated October 10, 2013 and posted with a press release on their website seems to have extoled San Francisco Values: A variety of options are available to to protect the privacy of all students. Pacific Justice Institute recently presented testimony to the California Legislature on AB1266, the unprecedented legislation to open sex-segregated facilities to transgender students. As such, we are very familiar with all of the arguments for and against going this direction, and we recognize FHS’ approach as being based in common misperception about this issue. For instance, one of the most radical school districts in the nation, San Francisco Unified (SFUSD), embraces transgender rights but still takes precautions to prevent abuse. SFISD testified to the Legislature that they require students

The Source Summary reproduces the first 150 words of the source article unless a Collective editor has explicitly locked a replacement.

Read the original article View inbound sources

Interpretive context

Why this article may matter

Community significance

“AB1266: Privacy For All Students and “San Francisco Values”” may matter to community readers because it preserves a first-person or testimonial account connected to education and youth, while also engaging transgender identity and history. Such accounts can document how an issue was understood and experienced from within the period or community being discussed.

Historical significance

As a publication record from 2014 at Transadvocate.com, “AB1266: Privacy For All Students and “San Francisco Values”” provides dated evidence of how education and youth was being argued in relation to transgender identity and history. Comparing it with earlier and later records can reveal changes in vocabulary, evidence, and emphasis.

Policy significance

The article’s strongest policy connection is research ethics and data governance and elections and democratic governance. It links that institutional frame to education and youth and transgender identity and history, making it potentially useful for tracing how an argument moves from description or history into law, regulation, administration, or public practice.

Content analysis

Ranked themes and framings

Rank 1 is the dominant inferred theme or framing. Parent labels identify broader theme families; the relationship key beneath the diagram explains the line styles used for hierarchy, same-family relationships, overlap, and separate-but-related themes.

Themes

1
Education and youthTheme family: Institutions, law, and public life
100%
2
Transgender identity and historyTheme family: Identity, culture, and community
94%
3
Public policy and governanceTheme family: Institutions, law, and public life
50%
4
Law and civil rightsTheme family: Institutions, law, and public life
44%
5
Violence, safety, and dehumanizationTheme family: Power, ideology, and social conflict
24%
6
Community and organizingTheme family: Identity, culture, and community
18%

Academic framing

1
Interpretive analysis
100%

Policy framing

1
Research ethics and data governance
100%
2
Elections and democratic governance
60%
3
Public accommodations and facilities
7%

Editorial function

Source topics

Relationship key

Overlapping themes
Related theme in the same family
Separate but related themes

The diagram distinguishes hierarchy, same-family relationships, overlap, and separate-but-related themes inferred within this article. It does not assert that all themes are mutually exclusive.

These classifications are inferred from article text and source metadata and remain directly editable. Relationship labels express corpus-analysis judgments, not immutable facts.

Granular comparative context

How “Education and youth” appears across the Collective corpus

This article appeared 1 year(s) after the theme’s highest annual presence in the registered corpus in 2013.

Relative presence by year

Peak year indexed to 100

5 2005

8 2006

16 2007

16 2008

12 2009

2 2010

27 2011

36 2012

106 2013

54 2014

14 2015

10 2016

30 2017

30 2018

3 2019

2 2020

1 2022

1 2024

2 2025

Presence by member publication

Frequently co-occurring concepts

Academic framings in this topic

Policy framings in this topic

Values measure relative presence in the registered Collective corpus, not public search interest or public opinion.

Inbound-link and citation evidence

Documented circulation and reception

No broad reception evidence has been documented yet; this may reflect unconfigured or incomplete indexes rather than an absence of circulation. These observations describe circulation and reuse; they do not assign cultural worth or evaluate the communities, arguments, or people discussed.

0distinct source records documented

0distinct referring domains

0best available scholarly cited-by count

0books or volumes documented

0references retained by the source publication

—observed years in dated evidence

Evidence by channel

Independent counts; bars are not additive

No channel totals are available yet.

Coverage of the evidence search

Shows what has actually been checked

Publisher-held referencesChecked · August 31, 2026

Scholarly indexesChecked · August 31, 2026

Book and volume searchNotchecked

Public-web searchNotconfigured

Collective corpus linksIndexed · August 31, 2026

Review scholarly results Review book results Review public-web results

No individual references have been stored yet. This can mean that source-held pingbacks have not been imported, provider access is not configured, or available indexes do not expose this work in a machine-readable form.

Counts describe documented circulation and reception in the sources currently available to the Collective. They are not a score of quality, merit, popularity, or social value, and provider totals can overlap.

Article authors

Author profiles and related researchers

Autumn Sandeen

57 publications · 89 inbound sources/citations