CAI-2026-1894-6ABB
This profile is a persistent identity and corpus record. Bibliographic facts, author-supplied information, editorial verification, computational measurements, model inferences, and external indexes are identified separately throughout the page.
- Profile status
- Unclaimed
John Stoltenberg, author of Refusing to Be a Man, The End of Manhood, and the novel GONERZ, is a trans-inclusive radical feminist, theater reviewer, and communications consultant based in Washington, DC.
Patterns in registered work
Explore how recurring themes and framings connect across this author’s registered publications. Each topic opens its Collective archive.
Drag a topic to rearrange the map. Drag empty space to move the constellation, use the mouse wheel or controls to zoom, and hover or focus a topic to emphasize its direct connections. Line strength reflects recurrence in this author’s registered corpus; it does not imply agreement or causation.
View topics as a text list
Themes
- Culture, identity, and representation 1 publication
- Feminism and gender politics 1 publication
- History, archives, and memory 1 publication
- Religion and morality 1 publication
- Science, evidence, and expertise 1 publication
- Sex and gender classification 1 publication
Academic framings
- Ethical analysis 1 publication
- Historical analysis 1 publication
- Interpretive analysis 1 publication
- Philosophical and ontological analysis 1 publication
Composition and completeness
This analysis covers 1 registered publications dated 2020–2020. Full source text was available for 1 records, partial text for 0, and metadata only for 0.
The registered corpus is the unit of analysis. These statistics describe available texts and metadata; they are not claims about the author’s personality, intelligence, intentions, identity, or private beliefs.
Registered output by year
No strong linear increase or decrease is visible in annual registered publication output. Linear model R²: 0.00.
Publication-length distribution
Mean 1,859 words · median 1,859 · standard deviation 0.
Member-publication distribution
Editorial forms represented
Thematic development over time
Theme-by-year heatmap
1 publication
Feminism and gender politics
Potential change points compare rolling three-year thematic distributions with Jensen-Shannon divergence. They are model-derived boundaries, not authoritative divisions in the author’s intellectual biography.
Breadth, concentration, and communities
Primary-theme assignments are strongly concentrated. The most recurrent primary themes are Feminism and gender politics.
Ranked themes
Theme communities
Culture, identity, and representation (1) · Feminism and gender politics (1) · History, archives, and memory (1) · Religion and morality (1) · Science, evidence, and expertise (1) · Sex and gender classification (1)
How the registered work approaches its subjects
Academic framings
Policy framings
No measurements are currently available.
Editorial functions
Academic and policy framing combinations
Measurable textual characteristics
Rhetorical feature profile
Axes are normalized to display scales stated in the methods note; the chart is comparative within the profile, not a grading instrument.
Sentence-length distribution
Distinctive terms relative to the Collective baseline
View rates and comparison values
| Term | Author rate / 1,000 | Collective rate / 1,000 | Log-odds z |
|---|---|---|---|
| radical | 22.16 | 1.50 | 12.16 |
| reproductive | 14.10 | 0.06 | 11.96 |
| women | 32.23 | 4.20 | 11.46 |
| capacity | 14.10 | 0.05 | 11.36 |
| category | 10.07 | 0.12 | 10.85 |
| manhood | 17.12 | 0.03 | 10.82 |
| oppressed | 10.07 | 0.20 | 10.58 |
| account | 10.07 | 0.25 | 10.30 |
| class | 9.06 | 0.29 | 9.45 |
| supremacy | 9.06 | 0.02 | 8.51 |
| male | 15.11 | 1.68 | 8.47 |
| transwomen | 7.05 | 0.24 | 8.35 |
| apart | 6.04 | 0.13 | 8.28 |
| binary | 8.06 | 0.44 | 8.00 |
| born | 9.06 | 0.61 | 7.95 |
| feminists | 9.06 | 0.68 | 7.68 |
| personal | 8.06 | 0.55 | 7.51 |
| oppression | 7.05 | 0.47 | 7.09 |
| biological | 6.04 | 0.41 | 6.60 |
| biology | 5.04 | 0.26 | 6.53 |
| structure | 4.03 | 0.15 | 6.42 |
| viewpoint | 3.02 | 0.03 | 6.23 |
| certainty | 3.02 | 0.05 | 6.23 |
| whenever | 3.02 | 0.02 | 6.09 |
Lexical statistics are descriptive properties of the available texts. They do not diagnose writing quality, intelligence, personality, or intent. Distinctive terms are compared with a sampled Collective baseline using smoothed log-odds.
What the registered corpus links to
Source families
Frequently linked domains
Source families are inferred from link domains and URL patterns. They describe the ecology of linked evidence and references, not the reliability or ideological position of an individual source.
Co-authorship and corpus similarity
Author relationship network
Co-authorship and corpus-based similarity are displayed as different relationship types.
Collaboration summary
Co-authors
Member publications
Co-authorship, corpus similarity, citation relationships, and publication overlap are shown as distinct relationship types. A corpus relationship does not imply a personal, institutional, or political association.
How evidence of reuse is distributed across the corpus
Evidence by channel
Reception concentration
The most-referenced 10% of publications account for approximately 0.0% of documented reception.
Publications with the most documented reception
| Publication | Year | All evidence | Scholarly | Books | Web |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| What the Trans Moment Has to Offer Radical Feminism (Part Two) | 2020 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reception measures documented circulation and reuse across the evidence sources available to the Collective. They do not establish quality, correctness, cultural worth, or the author’s social standing. Provider totals can overlap.
Contrasts with other registered Collective publications
The comparison baseline contains 1,200 other registered publications. Differences are descriptive contrasts, not author rankings.
Theme prevalence differences
Academic-framing differences
Policy-framing differences
Comparisons use the rest of the registered Collective as the default baseline. Percentage-point differences and standardized effects describe corpus contrasts; they are not rankings or evaluations of authors.
Places, institutions, periods, and populations represented
Populations discussed
- women1
- children and adolescents1
- families and parents1
- activists and organizers1
Coverage measures recurring places, institutions, historical periods, scopes, and population terms in the registered texts. It describes what is present in the corpus and does not judge omissions or infer the author’s identity or attitudes.
Different ways into the registered corpus
Representative workClosest to the semantic center of recurring work in the registered corpus.
What the Trans Moment Has to Offer Radical Feminism (Part Two)
Feminism and gender politics
Foundational workEarlier work whose primary themes persist in later registered publications.
What the Trans Moment Has to Offer Radical Feminism (Part Two)
Feminism and gender politics
Bridge workConnects publication clusters that would otherwise be less directly linked.
What the Trans Moment Has to Offer Radical Feminism (Part Two)
Feminism and gender politics
Turning-point workAppears near a model-detected change in thematic composition.
What the Trans Moment Has to Offer Radical Feminism (Part Two)
Feminism and gender politics
High documented receptionHas comparatively substantial documented circulation or citation evidence.
What the Trans Moment Has to Offer Radical Feminism (Part Two)
Feminism and gender politics
Central but less documented receptionIs structurally central to the corpus while having comparatively limited documented reception.
What the Trans Moment Has to Offer Radical Feminism (Part Two)
Feminism and gender politics
Atypical workDiffers most from the author’s other registered publications in corpus-relative lexical similarity.
What the Trans Moment Has to Offer Radical Feminism (Part Two)
Feminism and gender politics
Synthesis workCombines multiple themes and analytical framings that often appear separately.
What the Trans Moment Has to Offer Radical Feminism (Part Two)
Feminism and gender politics
These categories describe structural positions in the registered corpus. They do not establish scholarly quality, correctness, or cultural value.
Provenance, profile control, and research data
How to read this profile
Provided by a member publication.
Confirmed by the profile owner.
Reviewed by a Collective editor.
Calculated directly from registered text or metadata.
Produced by a versioned analytical model.
Obtained from an external bibliographic or web index.
Profile actions
Authors and other knowledgeable parties may request identity corrections, article-association review, classification review, or visibility changes. Requests create an editorial revision record rather than silently replacing prior data.
Download research data
Methods, coverage, and limitationsHow this corpus report was produced
Methods used
- descriptive statistics
- Shannon entropy and Herfindahl concentration
- TF-IDF cosine similarity
- weighted term co-occurrence
- network degree and betweenness centrality
- Jensen-Shannon divergence
- log-odds lexical keyness
- linear trend estimation
- Gini and Lorenz concentration analysis
- rule-based source and entity-family classification
Interpretive limits
- The analysis describes the registered corpus, not the author’s personality, intentions, identity, or private beliefs.
- Machine-generated themes, framings, source families, and entity families are provisional and remain open to editorial review.
- Citation and inbound-source coverage depends on the providers, identifiers, and public evidence available to the Collective.
- Semantic similarity is lexical and corpus-relative; it is not equivalent to human interpretation or a universal map of the subject.
- Where a corpus exceeds the stated processing limits, the profile reports a stratified analytical sample and retains the full registered bibliography.
- Analysis version
- 1.0.0
- Generated
- August 31, 2026
- Record processing limit
- 180
Publications in the Collective
What the Trans Moment Has to Offer Radical Feminism (Part Two)
What if male supremacy is no longer about reproductive biology? What if male supremacy’s engine has changed? That question comes to mind whenever I read in trans-critical radical feminists’ writings their bedrock argument that women are oppressed on…
Related authors
TransAdvocate Staff
11 publications · 2 inbound sources/citations
Connected through 1 citation link between registered publications. Shares registered themes including Culture, identity, and representation, Feminism and gender politics, History, archives, and memory.
Cristan Williams
319 publications · 3,580 inbound sources/citations
Shares registered themes including Culture, identity, and representation, Feminism and gender politics, History, archives, and memory.
Admin
98 publications · 0 inbound sources/citations
Shares registered themes including Culture, identity, and representation, Feminism and gender politics, History, archives, and memory.
Cristan Williams
143 publications · 714 inbound sources/citations
Shares registered themes including Culture, identity, and representation, Feminism and gender politics, History, archives, and memory.
Autumn Sandeen
57 publications · 89 inbound sources/citations
Shares registered themes including Culture, identity, and representation, Feminism and gender politics, History, archives, and memory.
Marti Abernathey
369 publications · 249 inbound sources/citations
Shares registered themes including Culture, identity, and representation, Feminism and gender politics, History, archives, and memory.
Guest
57 publications · 87 inbound sources/citations
Shares registered themes including Culture, identity, and representation, Feminism and gender politics, History, archives, and memory.
Marian
7 publications · 12 inbound sources/citations
Shares registered themes including Culture, identity, and representation, Feminism and gender politics, History, archives, and memory.
Related authors are calculated from co-authorship, shared themes and framings, and citation relationships in the registered corpus.