Trump set to abolish intersex people
A memo was recently leaked from the Department of Health and Human Services. In it, the HHS defines sex as a binary determined by chromosomes (presumed to come in only two forms, XX or XY), and states that sex cannot be changed. The memo has caused outrage because its goal is to define gender transition out of existence. Its aim is to discriminate against trans people, declaring them to be deluded or deceptive, their lived genders irrelevant. In so doing, it ignores the conclusions of every mainstream medical and psychological association, which is a bizarre position for a department supposedly aimed at recognizing and supporting medical treatment paradigms to take. Unrecognized as yet is how this proposed policy would also work to shatter the lives of intersex people. As is so often the case, intersex people’s lives and needs go unrecognized, so in this post, I will try to counter
The Source Summary reproduces the first 150 words of the source article unless a Collective editor has explicitly locked a replacement.
Why this article may matter
Community significance
“Trump set to abolish intersex people” may matter to community readers because it preserves a first-person or testimonial account connected to healthcare and medicine, while also engaging public policy and governance. Such accounts can document how an issue was understood and experienced from within the period or community being discussed.
Historical significance
The article may have historical value because it explicitly interprets or preserves material concerning healthcare and medicine. Published in 2018 by Transadvocate.com, it can be read both for the history it describes and as evidence of how public policy and governance was framed at that moment.
Policy significance
The article’s strongest policy connection is civil rights and anti-discrimination. It links that institutional frame to healthcare and medicine and public policy and governance, making it potentially useful for tracing how an argument moves from description or history into law, regulation, administration, or public practice.
Ranked themes and framings
Rank 1 is the dominant inferred theme or framing. Parent labels identify broader theme families; the relationship key beneath the diagram explains the line styles used for hierarchy, same-family relationships, overlap, and separate-but-related themes.
Themes
- 1Healthcare and medicineTheme family: Institutions, law, and public life100%
- 2Public policy and governanceTheme family: Institutions, law, and public life75%
- 3Transgender identity and historyTheme family: Identity, culture, and community72%
- 4Law and civil rightsTheme family: Institutions, law, and public life72%
- 5Science, evidence, and expertiseTheme family: Knowledge, history, and communication44%
- 6Education and youthTheme family: Institutions, law, and public life22%
Academic framing
- 1100%
- 262%
- 341%
- 418%
Policy framing
- 1100%
Editorial function
Source topics
- Overlapping themes
- Separate but related themes
- Related theme in the same family
These classifications are inferred from article text and source metadata and remain directly editable. Relationship labels express corpus-analysis judgments, not immutable facts.
How “Healthcare and medicine” appears across the Collective corpus
This article appeared 5 year(s) after the theme’s highest annual presence in the registered corpus in 2013.
Relative presence by year
Peak year indexed to 100Presence by member publication
Frequently co-occurring concepts
Academic framings in this topic
Policy framings in this topic
Values measure relative presence in the registered Collective corpus, not public search interest or public opinion.
Documented circulation and reception
No broad reception evidence has been documented yet; this may reflect unconfigured or incomplete indexes rather than an absence of circulation. These observations describe circulation and reuse; they do not assign cultural worth or evaluate the communities, arguments, or people discussed.
Evidence by channel
Independent counts; bars are not additiveNo channel totals are available yet.
Coverage of the evidence search
Shows what has actually been checkedNo individual references have been stored yet. This can mean that source-held pingbacks have not been imported, provider access is not configured, or available indexes do not expose this work in a machine-readable form.
Counts describe documented circulation and reception in the sources currently available to the Collective. They are not a score of quality, merit, popularity, or social value, and provider totals can overlap.
Author profiles and related researchers
Related authors in the Collective corpus
Related authors are calculated from co-authorship, shared themes and framings, and citation relationships in the registered corpus. This does not imply a personal or institutional association.
Continue through the Collective
TERFs & Trans Healthcare [UPDATED]
Adds research, documentation, or primary-source context.
NOTE: Janice Raymond herself claims that the assertions found on this page is false. An evidence-based review of her claim tells a different story. While there are many…
1966: Intro to Transsexual Phenomena, Harry Benjamin
Approaches the shared subject through a related analytical or disciplinary frame.
The TRANSSEXUAL PHENOMENON Harry Benjamin, M.D Preface and Acknowledgement There is a challenge as well as a handicap in writing a book on a subject that is not…
WATCH: School board bigot squirm
Examines legal, institutional, or policy consequences connected to the shared theme.
In what has to be one of the most facepalm-inducing interviews I’ve ever watched, Canadian school board trustee, Sam Sotiropoulos attempted to explain why he’s not a bigot…
SBF: Children have rights Mr. Perkins
Approaches the shared subject through a related analytical or disciplinary frame.
The Slowly Boiled Frog is biting commentary from David Cary Hart reflecting upon issues affecting the LGBT community. Tony Perkins will argue vociferously that a fetus has rights.…