This profile is a persistent identity and corpus record. Bibliographic facts, author-supplied information, editorial verification, computational measurements, model inferences, and external indexes are identified separately throughout the page.
Profile status
Unclaimed
7registered publications
5,437analyzed words
2011–2013represented publication period
4.7effective primary themes
5documented inbound sources/citations
1member publications represented
Interactive corpus map
Patterns in registered work
Explore how recurring themes and framings connect across this author’s registered publications. Each topic opens its Collective archive.
ThemeAcademic framingPolicy framingRecurring co-occurrenceConnection across framing typesBroader and narrower term
Drag a topic to rearrange the map. Drag empty space to move the constellation, use the mouse wheel or controls to zoom, and hover or focus a topic to emphasize its direct connections. Line strength reflects recurrence in this author’s registered corpus; it does not imply agreement or causation.
This analysis covers 7 registered publications dated 2011–2013. Full source text was available for 7 records, partial text for 0, and metadata only for 0.
The registered corpus is the unit of analysis. These statistics describe available texts and metadata; they are not claims about the author’s personality, intelligence, intentions, identity, or private beliefs.
7publications analyzed
740median words per publication
100.0%full-text coverage
0.0%archival-copy coverage
0co-authored publications
0possible duplicate groups
Registered output by year
PublicationsDocumented reception
40
2011
20
2012
15
2013
Registered publication output trends downward across the represented years. Linear model R²: 0.96.
Publication-length distribution
2593–641
0641–689
1689–737
1737–785
0785–833
1833–881
0881–929
2929–977
Mean 777 words · median 740 · standard deviation 147.
Community and organizing · Transgender identity and history · Science, evidence, and expertise · Culture, identity, and representation
Potential change points compare rolling three-year thematic distributions with Jensen-Shannon divergence. They are model-derived boundaries, not authoritative divisions in the author’s intellectual biography.
Theme ecology
Breadth, concentration, and communities
96.3%normalized thematic breadth
4.7effective primary themes
0.225theme concentration (HHI)
100%mean primary-theme confidence
Primary-theme assignments are broadly distributed. The most recurrent primary themes are Community and organizing, Transgender identity and history, Science, evidence, and expertise.
Proximity reflects corpus-relative lexical similarity. Larger nodes have more documented inbound evidence; node color reflects the primary theme.
Publication; color identifies primary themeStronger lexical similarityLarger node: more documented reception
The semantic map uses TF-IDF vectors and cosine similarity within this registered corpus. Position is produced by a force layout from the strongest similarity edges; proximity is relative, not an absolute measure of meaning.
Axes are normalized to display scales stated in the methods note; the chart is comparative within the profile, not a grading instrument.
Sentence-length distribution
1012–16
9816–30
2430–44
1744–58
558–71
171–85
285–99
199–113
1.7questions per 1,000 words
6.7quoted passages per 1,000 words
3.5outbound links per 1,000 words
Distinctive terms relative to the Collective baseline
gender-related13.9
identity10.6
behavior10.0
person’s9.5
king8.5
shall8.5
victims7.4
luther7.3
martin7.2
purpose7.1
store7.0
baltimore6.8
serial6.8
rapes6.7
improper6.7
consistent6.5
manager6.3
28th6.3
View rates and comparison values
Term
Author rate / 1,000
Collective rate / 1,000
Log-odds z
gender-related
10.28
0.13
13.87
identity
15.79
2.94
10.59
behavior
7.71
0.70
9.99
person’s
4.77
0.18
9.49
king
3.67
0.11
8.53
shall
3.67
0.05
8.50
victims
3.30
0.21
7.36
luther
2.57
0.06
7.28
martin
2.57
0.08
7.21
purpose
3.30
0.24
7.11
store
2.57
0.11
6.97
baltimore
2.20
0.05
6.78
serial
2.20
0.05
6.78
rapes
2.20
0.03
6.73
improper
2.57
0.02
6.65
consistent
2.20
0.09
6.50
manager
2.20
0.11
6.34
28th
2.20
0.02
6.34
meme
2.57
0.21
6.11
dignity
1.84
0.07
6.07
rapists
1.84
0.07
6.07
intended
1.84
0.08
6.00
caused
2.20
0.16
5.88
table
1.84
0.09
5.83
Lexical statistics are descriptive properties of the available texts. They do not diagnose writing quality, intelligence, personality, or intent. Distinctive terms are compared with a sampled Collective baseline using smoothed log-odds.
Source families are inferred from link domains and URL patterns. They describe the ecology of linked evidence and references, not the reliability or ideological position of an individual source.
Collaboration and relationships
Co-authorship and corpus similarity
Author relationship network
Co-authorship and corpus-based similarity are displayed as different relationship types.
Co-authorship, corpus similarity, citation relationships, and publication overlap are shown as distinct relationship types. A corpus relationship does not imply a personal, institutional, or political association.
Documented circulation and reception
How evidence of reuse is distributed across the corpus
5documented source records
1distinct referring domains
0scholarly citation records or provider total
0books or edited-volume references
14.3%publications with evidence
0.857reception concentration (Gini)
Evidence by channel
Source-publication references5
Public-web references0
Scholarly citing works0
Books and edited volumes0
Links inside the Collective0
Media and educational references0
Reception concentration
The most-referenced 10% of publications account for approximately 100.0% of documented reception.
Reception measures documented circulation and reuse across the evidence sources available to the Collective. They do not establish quality, correctness, cultural worth, or the author’s social standing. Provider totals can overlap.
Comparative corpus context
Contrasts with other registered Collective publications
The comparison baseline contains 1,200 other registered publications. Differences are descriptive contrasts, not author rankings.
Comparisons use the rest of the registered Collective as the default baseline. Percentage-point differences and standardized effects describe corpus contrasts; they are not rankings or evaluations of authors.
Corpus coverage
Places, institutions, periods, and populations represented
Geographic coverage
United States4
United Kingdom1
Institutions named
U.S. Department1
American Psychological Association1
Historical periods
2010s7
1960s2
1980s2
2000s1
Populations discussed
transgender people5
women5
activists and organizers1
Coverage measures recurring places, institutions, historical periods, scopes, and population terms in the registered texts. It describes what is present in the corpus and does not judge omissions or infer the author’s identity or attitudes.
Guided reading paths
Different ways into the registered corpus
Representative workClosest to the semantic center of recurring work in the registered corpus.
These categories describe structural positions in the registered corpus. They do not establish scholarly quality, correctness, or cultural value.
Trust, correction, and reuse
Provenance, profile control, and research data
How to read this profile
Source-supplied
Provided by a member publication.
Author-verified
Confirmed by the profile owner.
Editor-verified
Reviewed by a Collective editor.
Computationally measured
Calculated directly from registered text or metadata.
Model-inferred
Produced by a versioned analytical model.
External index
Obtained from an external bibliographic or web index.
Profile actions
Authors and other knowledgeable parties may request identity corrections, article-association review, classification review, or visibility changes. Requests create an editorial revision record rather than silently replacing prior data.
On January 28th, 2011, if you were told that the Trans community would be more organized than the LGB community moving forward in the next legislative session, that Marriage and the Gender Identity anti-discrimination bills would both come…
I dread writing this post. Not because it is laborious, or texting on my personal resources, but because my sensibilities are afflicted by the subject matter. It is neither my desire nor intent to further inflame an already…
I recently had a conversation with a friend of mine, someone that I’ve known for over 5 years. Due to the inherent rapid socialization many members of the transgender community experience in the transition process, 5 years seems…
Please note at writing, the planned dedication service for the Martin Luther King Jr Memorial has been postponed. The marvelous new militancy which has engulfed the Negro community must not lead us to a distrust of all white…
Massachusetts recently signed into law an anti-discrimination bill which adds gender identity to its protected classes in the areas of employment and housing only. Gender identity is defined as follows: “Gender identity” shall mean a person’s gender-related identity,…
as if you needed to read any more… THE CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR OF THE SERIAL RAPIST From 1984 to 1986, FBI Special Agents assigned to theNationalCenterfor the Analysis of Violent Crime (NCAVC) interviewed 41 men who were responsible for…
Recently I came across an interesting story in my newsfeed. It seems Sir Richard Branson, of Virgin Air lost a wager to Air Asia Group CEO Tony Fernandes. Sir Branson bet Mr Fernandes over whose Formula 1 team…
