Phalloplasty
The topic engenders polarized debate within the transgender community. Nowhere more than on internet support groups where, in the same thread, you will see some regard it as lifesaving and others as “frankendicks” that lack sensation and are “never good enough.” This body shaming would be unacceptable in any other context, yet it is routine with phalloplasty. There are several possible reasons for this. The scarcity of surgeons and funds to pay for surgery can cause some to decry these procedures as something they wouldn’t want even if they could access them. The scientific evidence, however, reveals that, despite complications, phalloplasty satisfaction rates reach 100% and, overall, 97% in one review of several different studies. On the other side, there is tremendous pressure placed on transmen who’ve had phalloplasty to portray their experiences as universally positive for fear of negatively impacting its availability or contributing to stereotypes about their genitals.
The Source Summary reproduces the first 150 words of the source article unless a Collective editor has explicitly locked a replacement.
Why this article may matter
Community significance
“Phalloplasty” may matter to community readers because it preserves a first-person or testimonial account connected to healthcare and medicine, while also engaging transgender identity and history. Such accounts can document how an issue was understood and experienced from within the period or community being discussed.
Historical significance
The article may have historical value because it explicitly interprets or preserves material concerning healthcare and medicine. Published in 2019 by Transadvocate.com, it can be read both for the history it describes and as evidence of how transgender identity and history was framed at that moment.
Policy significance
“Phalloplasty” discusses institutions, law, or governance in connection with healthcare and medicine. Even without a dominant policy classification, the article may help researchers identify practical consequences for transgender identity and history.
Ranked themes and framings
Rank 1 is the dominant inferred theme or framing. Parent labels identify broader theme families; the relationship diagram distinguishes sub-themes, siblings, overlap, and separate-but-related themes.
Themes
- 1Healthcare and medicineTheme family: Institutions, law, and public life100%
- 2Transgender identity and historyTheme family: Identity, culture, and community95%
- 3Science, evidence, and expertiseTheme family: Knowledge, history, and communication65%
- 4Community and organizingTheme family: Identity, culture, and community30%
- 5Technology, data, and platformsTheme family: Knowledge, history, and communication28%
- 6Media, rhetoric, and discourseTheme family: Knowledge, history, and communication18%
Academic framing
- 1100%
- 267%
- 342%
- 433%
Editorial function
Source topics
These classifications are inferred from article text and source metadata and remain directly editable. Relationship labels express corpus-analysis judgments, not immutable facts.
How “Healthcare and medicine” appears across the Collective corpus
This article appeared 6 year(s) after the theme’s highest annual presence in the registered corpus in 2013.
Relative presence by year
Peak year indexed to 100Presence by member publication
Frequently co-occurring concepts
Academic framings in this topic
Policy framings in this topic
Values measure relative presence in the registered Collective corpus, not public search interest or public opinion.
Sources that reference this article
Search this title in Google Scholar
References over time
Yearly scholarly series: OpenCitations, plus directly verified non-scholarly linksCoverage combines internal Collective links, verified Webmentions, curated evidence, supported scholarly indexes, and optional public-web discovery. Search-result candidates remain visibly distinct from directly verified links and provider-confirmed citations. This is not an exhaustive index of the public web or of Google Scholar.
Author profiles and related researchers
Related authors in the Collective corpus
Related authors are calculated from co-authorship, shared themes and framings, and citation relationships in the registered corpus. This does not imply a personal or institutional association.
Continue through the Collective
#TERFlogic: Social habits learned as a kid is the sexed essence that makes a woman a woman because “sex and gender are not interchangeable”
Approaches the shared subject through a related analytical or disciplinary frame.
From the Telegraph article: “The BBC Radio 4 presenter said that men who had grown up with all the privileges that entails did not have the shared experience…
Deconstructing TERF Tropes
Provides a contextually related perspective from elsewhere in the Collective.
The Strawman Shuffle: TERFs tend to behave much like a right wing echo chamber so that once a new anti-trans strawman is created, it is quickly disseminated and…
Unethical Trans Doc Exposed
Provides a contextually related perspective from elsewhere in the Collective.
It’s hard to say exactly when Dr. Christopher Salgado, board certified and celebrated genital reconstruction surgeon, started to post questionable things on his Instagram account (@sexsurgeon). The account…
1978: Transgenderal = Full-Time, Non-Op
Provides a contextually related perspective from elsewhere in the Collective.
Archives of SexualBehavior, VoL 7, No. 4, 1978 Open Forum John Money, Ph.D., Moderator The Johns Hopkins University, Schoo] of Medicine Baltimore, Maryland 21205 Before becoming involved in…