Cis Women, You Can’t Support Trans Women And Push The Bathroom Predator Meme
I’ve had a neutral opinion about Roseanne Barr over the years but that may be about to change in a negative direction. She let fly with a series of transphobic tweets that makes me wonder if she went to Michfest this year. The transphobic Twitter exchange was driven by guess what, the bathroom issue. Kola Boof stuck her nose in the middle of this transphobic Twitter mess and unleashed a series of problematic tweets in support of Roseanne. Note to Kola and ‘errbody’ else: You cannot call yourself a supporter of trans women and pimp the demonstrably false bathroom predator meme at the same time. By doing so you, Roseanne and anyone else who pushes this meme is interpreted by trans women as you really don’t respect us and our femininity. It also causes trans women to question just how much of an ally to our community you really are.
The Source Summary reproduces the first 150 words of the source article unless a Collective editor has explicitly locked a replacement.
Why this article may matter
Community significance
“Cis Women, You Can’t Support Trans Women And Push The Bathroom Predator Meme” may matter to community readers because it preserves a first-person or testimonial account connected to community and organizing, while also engaging feminism and gender politics. Such accounts can document how an issue was understood and experienced from within the period or community being discussed.
Historical significance
As a publication record from 2012 at Transadvocate.com, “Cis Women, You Can’t Support Trans Women And Push The Bathroom Predator Meme” provides dated evidence of how community and organizing was being argued in relation to feminism and gender politics. Comparing it with earlier and later records can reveal changes in vocabulary, evidence, and emphasis.
Policy significance
The article’s strongest policy connection is public accommodations and facilities. It links that institutional frame to community and organizing and feminism and gender politics, making it potentially useful for tracing how an argument moves from description or history into law, regulation, administration, or public practice.
Ranked themes and framings
Rank 1 is the dominant inferred theme or framing. Parent labels identify broader theme families; the relationship diagram distinguishes sub-themes, siblings, overlap, and separate-but-related themes.
Themes
- 1Community and organizingTheme family: Identity, culture, and community100%
- 2Feminism and gender politicsTheme family: Power, ideology, and social conflict50%
- 3Public policy and governanceTheme family: Institutions, law, and public life30%
- 4Violence, safety, and dehumanizationTheme family: Power, ideology, and social conflict30%
- 5Science, evidence, and expertiseTheme family: Knowledge, history, and communication30%
Academic framing
- 1100%
Policy framing
- 1100%
Editorial function
Source topics
These classifications are inferred from article text and source metadata and remain directly editable. Relationship labels express corpus-analysis judgments, not immutable facts.
How “Community and organizing” appears across the Collective corpus
This article appeared 1 year(s) before the theme reached its highest annual presence in the registered corpus in 2013.
Relative presence by year
Peak year indexed to 100Presence by member publication
Frequently co-occurring concepts
- Transgender identity and history519
- Law and civil rights291
- Violence, safety, and dehumanization180
- Education and youth174
- Culture, identity, and representation172
- Media, rhetoric, and discourse166
- Feminism and gender politics161
- History, archives, and memory157
- Public policy and governance129
- Labor, economics, and institutions120
Academic framings in this topic
Policy framings in this topic
Values measure relative presence in the registered Collective corpus, not public search interest or public opinion.
Sources that reference this article
No individual inbound sources have been stored yet. Counts can still appear when a scholarly index supplies aggregate citation metadata.
Coverage combines internal Collective links, verified Webmentions, curated evidence, supported scholarly indexes, and optional public-web discovery. Search-result candidates remain visibly distinct from directly verified links and provider-confirmed citations. This is not an exhaustive index of the public web or of Google Scholar.
Author profiles and related researchers
Related authors in the Collective corpus
Related authors are calculated from co-authorship, shared themes and framings, and citation relationships in the registered corpus. This does not imply a personal or institutional association.
Continue through the Collective
#TERFLogic: If you #ProtectTransKids, cis women won’t be safe in the bathroom
Examines legal, institutional, or policy consequences connected to the shared theme.
BONUS: Also, forcing trans kids to be cis is how you really protect a trans kids! Studies like the one below are all fake news!!! Rate this example…
University Of Pittsburgh Imposes A Transphobic Gendered Facilities Policy
Examines legal, institutional, or policy consequences connected to the shared theme.
When the 2012-13 school year rolls around, I’ll be joining much of the Big East Conference in hatin’ on the University of Pittsburgh for a different reason other…
#TERFLogic: TERF’s nose makes her treat random men like they’re women and random women like they’re men
Approaches the shared subject through a related analytical or disciplinary frame.
Plus, in the transwoman’s case, it’s the smell that clues me in. They don’t smell like women, I’m hypersensitive to that kind of thing so it’s not something…
#TERFLogic: uterine transplants won’t work on trans women because they don’t have “female brains”
Approaches the shared subject through a related analytical or disciplinary frame.
… which somehow also simultaneously proves that there’s no such thing as a male or female brain because “brain sex” theories are “horse crap”. Rate this example of…