Naming the problem
What follows are the words of a cisgender feminist who can no longer not name the problem: I suppose in the past I’ve avoided, for the most part, discussing specific perpetrators of transphobia and transmisogyny. My reasoning for this has been that this shit is structural: one perpetrator does not a system make, and bringing the fucker down won’t heal anything without deep change. I prefer to discuss things more broadly, as a nod to the systemic nature of these problems. So let’s talk about the problem named Cathy Brennan. I doubt I need to introduce her to you. The first Google hit for her name gives a precis on what she’s like. For more, it’s really worth looking at the work the trans community has done on collating the abuse she has perpetrated and the heartbreaking personal accounts of what she’s done. Brennan is one of the most virulent
The Source Summary reproduces the first 150 words of the source article unless a Collective editor has explicitly locked a replacement.
Why this article may matter
Community significance
“Naming the problem” may matter to community readers because it preserves a first-person or testimonial account connected to violence, safety, and dehumanization, while also engaging transgender identity and history. Such accounts can document how an issue was understood and experienced from within the period or community being discussed.
Historical significance
As a publication record from 2013 at The TERFs, “Naming the problem” provides dated evidence of how violence, safety, and dehumanization was being argued in relation to transgender identity and history. Comparing it with earlier and later records can reveal changes in vocabulary, evidence, and emphasis.
Policy significance
No dominant policy frame was detected in “Naming the problem.” Its policy relevance, when present, is therefore likely indirect: the article’s treatment of violence, safety, and dehumanization may shape later arguments about institutions or public practice rather than proposing a specific rule.
Ranked themes and framings
Rank 1 is the dominant inferred theme or framing. Parent labels identify broader theme families; the relationship diagram distinguishes sub-themes, siblings, overlap, and separate-but-related themes.
Themes
- 1Violence, safety, and dehumanizationTheme family: Power, ideology, and social conflict100%
- 2Transgender identity and historyTheme family: Identity, culture, and community80%
- 3Feminism and gender politicsTheme family: Power, ideology, and social conflict80%
- 4Community and organizingTheme family: Identity, culture, and community80%
Academic framing
- 1100%
Editorial function
Source topics
These classifications are inferred from article text and source metadata and remain directly editable. Relationship labels express corpus-analysis judgments, not immutable facts.
How “Violence, safety, and dehumanization” appears across the Collective corpus
This article was published during the theme’s highest-presence year in the registered corpus (2013).
Relative presence by year
Peak year indexed to 100Presence by member publication
Frequently co-occurring concepts
Academic framings in this topic
Values measure relative presence in the registered Collective corpus, not public search interest or public opinion.
Sources that reference this article
No individual inbound sources have been stored yet. Counts can still appear when a scholarly index supplies aggregate citation metadata.
Coverage combines internal Collective links, verified Webmentions, curated evidence, supported scholarly indexes, and optional public-web discovery. Search-result candidates remain visibly distinct from directly verified links and provider-confirmed citations. This is not an exhaustive index of the public web or of Google Scholar.
Author profiles and related researchers
Related authors in the Collective corpus
Related authors are calculated from co-authorship, shared themes and framings, and citation relationships in the registered corpus. This does not imply a personal or institutional association.
Continue through the Collective
#TERFLogic: Is it wrong to tolerate trans people? Yes, yes it is.
Approaches the shared subject through a related analytical or disciplinary frame.
Also, trans people are possible murderers!!! (unlike cis women, right?) And besides, trans women commit crimes (like rape and pedophiliat) at the same (or even greater!!11) rate that…
#TERFLogic: Abortion group changes name & proves that trans people erase “biology”
Approaches the shared subject through a related analytical or disciplinary frame.
A pro-choice fund in Texas changed its name in 2014. Some TERFs found out in 2016 and see the name change as proof that biology itself is somehow…
#TERFLogic: It’s abusive to be supportive of trans people & their families
Approaches the shared subject through a related analytical or disciplinary frame.
Rate this example of #TERFLogic! Rating System: 1 star = Relatively Reasonable 5 stars = Total Bullshit [yasr_visitor_votes size=”large”] Report TERF Harassment | Where did “TERF” come from?…
TERF Appropriation of the Trans Day of Remembrance
Offers a critical, contrasting, or corrective interpretation of the shared issue.
Our friend Lee is back with another awesome critical commentary comic: On May 13, the TransAdvocate wrote about the appropriation of the Trans Day of Remembrance by Trans…