Sheila Jeffreys’ source is now stalking trans kids
A source Sheila Jeffreys used to construct her sex essentialist anti-trans book, Gender Hurts is currently stalking trans kids. “I am grateful, too, to the new wave of radical feminism both online and offline. Radical feminist bloggers such as… Dirt from ‘Dirt from Dirt’, among others, have provided invaluable factual material, references and ideas on their blogs, without which it would have been harder to write this book. Indeed, over the period that this book has been incubating, radical feminist bloggers strengthened and clarified my analysis.” [1] – Sheila Jeffreys, Gender Hurts, Acknowledgements The below conversation is between a trans advocate and the account run by a collective of TERF opinion leaders. The TERF account expressly endorses the harassment of children in the hopes that their adult gaze and assessment might make transition too difficult to undertake for other trans kids. [View the story “Stunning defense of a public website
The Source Summary reproduces the first 150 words of the source article unless a Collective editor has explicitly locked a replacement.
Why this article may matter
Community significance
“Sheila Jeffreys’ source is now stalking trans kids” may matter to community readers because it preserves a first-person or testimonial account connected to feminism and gender politics, while also engaging sex and gender classification. Such accounts can document how an issue was understood and experienced from within the period or community being discussed.
Historical significance
The article may have historical value because it explicitly interprets or preserves material concerning feminism and gender politics. Published in 2015 by The TERFs, it can be read both for the history it describes and as evidence of how sex and gender classification was framed at that moment.
Policy significance
No dominant policy frame was detected in “Sheila Jeffreys’ source is now stalking trans kids.” Its policy relevance, when present, is therefore likely indirect: the article’s treatment of feminism and gender politics may shape later arguments about institutions or public practice rather than proposing a specific rule.
Ranked themes and framings
Rank 1 is the dominant inferred theme or framing. Parent labels identify broader theme families; the relationship diagram distinguishes sub-themes, siblings, overlap, and separate-but-related themes.
Themes
- 1Feminism and gender politicsTheme family: Power, ideology, and social conflict100%
- 2Sex and gender classificationTheme family: Power, ideology, and social conflict9%
- 3Violence, safety, and dehumanizationTheme family: Power, ideology, and social conflict9%
- 4Education and youthTheme family: Institutions, law, and public life9%
- 5Transgender identity and historyTheme family: Identity, culture, and community7%
- 6History, archives, and memoryTheme family: Knowledge, history, and communication3%
Academic framing
- 1100%
- 280%
- 360%
Editorial function
Source topics
These classifications are inferred from article text and source metadata and remain directly editable. Relationship labels express corpus-analysis judgments, not immutable facts.
How “Feminism and gender politics” appears across the Collective corpus
This article appeared 2 year(s) after the theme’s highest annual presence in the registered corpus in 2013.
Relative presence by year
Peak year indexed to 100Presence by member publication
Frequently co-occurring concepts
- Transgender identity and history186
- Community and organizing161
- Violence, safety, and dehumanization112
- Media, rhetoric, and discourse76
- Law and civil rights69
- Culture, identity, and representation68
- Education and youth52
- Healthcare and medicine48
- History, archives, and memory42
- Science, evidence, and expertise33
Academic framings in this topic
Values measure relative presence in the registered Collective corpus, not public search interest or public opinion.
Sources that reference this article
No individual inbound sources have been stored yet. Counts can still appear when a scholarly index supplies aggregate citation metadata.
Coverage combines internal Collective links, verified Webmentions, curated evidence, supported scholarly indexes, and optional public-web discovery. Search-result candidates remain visibly distinct from directly verified links and provider-confirmed citations. This is not an exhaustive index of the public web or of Google Scholar.
Author profiles and related researchers
Related authors in the Collective corpus
Related authors are calculated from co-authorship, shared themes and framings, and citation relationships in the registered corpus. This does not imply a personal or institutional association.
Continue through the Collective
Gender Critical Feminism, the roots of Radical Feminism and Trans oppression
Approaches the shared subject through a related analytical or disciplinary frame.
Gender Critical Feminism (GCF) is a euphemism for Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminism (TERF). There is no ideological difference between the TERF and “Gender Critical Feminist” (GCF) movement; they are…
What a 90s Cartoon Can Teach Us about TERFs
Provides a contextually related perspective from elsewhere in the Collective.
By Lisa Kalayji Do you remember the 1990s MTV cartoon Daria? If you’re old enough and young enough, you probably do. For those who missed it or are…
Transphobe Alex Jones Seems to Watch Trans Porn
Supplies historical or archival context for the issue discussed here.
Alex Jones, recently banned from various platforms such as Facebook and YouTube for, in part, his dehumanization of trans people, accidentally revealed that he watches trans porn on…
Remembering who we are
Provides a contextually related perspective from elsewhere in the Collective.
You can hear anti-queer people bloviating nonstop about who they think we are and after a while, this psychological erasure is can take its toll. Today we remember…