This profile is a persistent identity and corpus record. Bibliographic facts, author-supplied information, editorial verification, computational measurements, model inferences, and external indexes are identified separately throughout the page.
Profile status
Unclaimed
7registered publications
10,750analyzed words
2011–2012represented publication period
3.2effective primary themes
1documented inbound sources/citations
1member publications represented
Interactive corpus map
Patterns in registered work
Explore how recurring themes and framings connect across this author’s registered publications. Each topic opens its Collective archive.
ThemeAcademic framingPolicy framingRecurring co-occurrenceConnection across framing typesBroader and narrower term
Drag a topic to rearrange the map. Drag empty space to move the constellation, use the mouse wheel or controls to zoom, and hover or focus a topic to emphasize its direct connections. Line strength reflects recurrence in this author’s registered corpus; it does not imply agreement or causation.
This analysis covers 7 registered publications dated 2011–2012. Full source text was available for 7 records, partial text for 0, and metadata only for 0.
The registered corpus is the unit of analysis. These statistics describe available texts and metadata; they are not claims about the author’s personality, intelligence, intentions, identity, or private beliefs.
7publications analyzed
1,548median words per publication
100.0%full-text coverage
0.0%archival-copy coverage
0co-authored publications
0possible duplicate groups
Registered output by year
PublicationsDocumented reception
41
2011
30
2012
Registered publication output trends downward across the represented years. Linear model R²: 1.00.
Publication-length distribution
1799–996
1996–1,193
11,193–1,390
11,390–1,587
11,587–1,783
01,783–1,980
11,980–2,177
12,177–2,374
Mean 1,536 words · median 1,548 · standard deviation 564.
Transgender identity and history · Violence, safety, and dehumanization · Religion and morality · Feminism and gender politics
Potential change points compare rolling three-year thematic distributions with Jensen-Shannon divergence. They are model-derived boundaries, not authoritative divisions in the author’s intellectual biography.
Theme ecology
Breadth, concentration, and communities
83.2%normalized thematic breadth
3.2effective primary themes
0.388theme concentration (HHI)
100%mean primary-theme confidence
Primary-theme assignments are broadly distributed. The most recurrent primary themes are Transgender identity and history, Violence, safety, and dehumanization, Religion and morality.
Proximity reflects corpus-relative lexical similarity. Larger nodes have more documented inbound evidence; node color reflects the primary theme.
Publication; color identifies primary themeStronger lexical similarityLarger node: more documented reception
The semantic map uses TF-IDF vectors and cosine similarity within this registered corpus. Position is produced by a force layout from the strongest similarity edges; proximity is relative, not an absolute measure of meaning.
Axes are normalized to display scales stated in the methods note; the chart is comparative within the profile, not a grading instrument.
Sentence-length distribution
2942–22
16122–42
3042–61
1161–81
081–101
0101–121
0121–140
1140–160
5.8questions per 1,000 words
10.2quoted passages per 1,000 words
1.9outbound links per 1,000 words
Distinctive terms relative to the Collective baseline
space14.1
cross-dressers11.0
hatred10.7
feminism9.6
feminists9.2
love9.1
women’s8.7
oppression8.0
diversity7.8
spaces7.0
women-only6.9
together6.7
funeral6.5
vital6.5
justice6.5
social6.5
oppressed6.4
studies6.3
View rates and comparison values
Term
Author rate / 1,000
Collective rate / 1,000
Log-odds z
space
7.74
0.32
14.08
cross-dressers
5.55
0.06
10.95
hatred
4.36
0.16
10.67
feminism
5.95
0.82
9.63
feminists
5.16
0.67
9.19
love
5.95
0.95
9.09
women’s
4.76
0.64
8.70
oppression
3.57
0.41
7.98
diversity
2.58
0.18
7.75
spaces
1.98
0.12
6.99
women-only
1.98
0.03
6.90
together
2.38
0.26
6.68
funeral
1.59
0.07
6.51
vital
1.59
0.03
6.51
justice
3.57
0.68
6.50
social
5.16
1.35
6.48
oppressed
2.58
0.36
6.44
studies
2.18
0.25
6.31
society
3.97
0.90
6.23
responses
1.39
0.03
6.15
incredibly
1.39
0.06
6.11
systemic
1.39
0.07
6.05
thus
2.18
0.30
5.92
woman
6.55
2.26
5.90
Lexical statistics are descriptive properties of the available texts. They do not diagnose writing quality, intelligence, personality, or intent. Distinctive terms are compared with a sampled Collective baseline using smoothed log-odds.
Source families are inferred from link domains and URL patterns. They describe the ecology of linked evidence and references, not the reliability or ideological position of an individual source.
Collaboration and relationships
Co-authorship and corpus similarity
Author relationship network
Co-authorship and corpus-based similarity are displayed as different relationship types.
Co-authorship, corpus similarity, citation relationships, and publication overlap are shown as distinct relationship types. A corpus relationship does not imply a personal, institutional, or political association.
Documented circulation and reception
How evidence of reuse is distributed across the corpus
1documented source records
1distinct referring domains
0scholarly citation records or provider total
0books or edited-volume references
14.3%publications with evidence
0.857reception concentration (Gini)
Evidence by channel
Source-publication references1
Public-web references0
Scholarly citing works0
Books and edited volumes0
Links inside the Collective0
Media and educational references0
Documented references over time
12011
Reception concentration
The most-referenced 10% of publications account for approximately 100.0% of documented reception.
Reception measures documented circulation and reuse across the evidence sources available to the Collective. They do not establish quality, correctness, cultural worth, or the author’s social standing. Provider totals can overlap.
Comparative corpus context
Contrasts with other registered Collective publications
The comparison baseline contains 1,200 other registered publications. Differences are descriptive contrasts, not author rankings.
Comparisons use the rest of the registered Collective as the default baseline. Percentage-point differences and standardized effects describe corpus contrasts; they are not rankings or evaluations of authors.
Corpus coverage
Places, institutions, periods, and populations represented
Geographic coverage
United States3
Institutions named
National Women’s Studies Association1
Historical periods
1970s4
1990s2
1980s1
2010s1
Populations discussed
women7
transgender people5
activists and organizers4
families and parents3
children and adolescents3
students and educators2
racial and ethnic communities2
disabled people1
Coverage measures recurring places, institutions, historical periods, scopes, and population terms in the registered texts. It describes what is present in the corpus and does not judge omissions or infer the author’s identity or attitudes.
Guided reading paths
Different ways into the registered corpus
Representative workClosest to the semantic center of recurring work in the registered corpus.
These categories describe structural positions in the registered corpus. They do not establish scholarly quality, correctness, or cultural value.
Trust, correction, and reuse
Provenance, profile control, and research data
How to read this profile
Source-supplied
Provided by a member publication.
Author-verified
Confirmed by the profile owner.
Editor-verified
Reviewed by a Collective editor.
Computationally measured
Calculated directly from registered text or metadata.
Model-inferred
Produced by a versioned analytical model.
External index
Obtained from an external bibliographic or web index.
Profile actions
Authors and other knowledgeable parties may request identity corrections, article-association review, classification review, or visibility changes. Requests create an editorial revision record rather than silently replacing prior data.
I was absolutely horrified, but sadly not surprised, to read about the treatment of Lashai Mclean at her own funeral. The article “Mass Walk-Out at Trans Woman’s Funeral” discusses how the minister presiding over the funeral engaged in…
I have awoken multiple times from a nightmare hearing this phrase screamed at me over and over again. Whether awake or asleep, it echoes over and over and over again through my brain. It is like machine-gun fire,…
It is beyond sad that some people, trans and non-trans alike, think that Chaz Bono’s upcoming appearance on the stupid reality show “Dancing with the Stars” amounts to anything more than a hill of beans. As trans people…
Photo by: Mariette Pathy Allen Readers of this Blog may remember a while back that I did a post called Why I Love Fat People. In simple 1-10 list form, it catalogued many of the reasons why I…
Recently, I have experienced a round of attacks by some radical-identified feminists and lesbian feminists for my writings and transgender advocacy. There is a long history of conflict between transgender/transsexual people, especially trans women, and radical feminists and…
One of the things that has irked me about the renewed “debates” about women-only space is that the defenders of “womyn-born-womyn” (WBW) policies keep utilizing specious counter-examples to try to defend their position. For example, those of us…
On WMST-L (a large Women’s Studies Listserv with over 5,000 members from around the Globe) there has been a thread with quite a few responses about the so-called issue of “lesbian erasure.” Apparently, some radical lesbian feminists feel…
