And we’re back
Apparently my research blog has been down for a few weeks. I just learned about it when I went to add some content today. After an hour of fiddling with my database, I tracked down the bug…
The Source Summary reproduces the first 150 words of the source article unless a Collective editor has explicitly locked a replacement.
Why this article may matter
Community significance
“And we’re back” may matter to community readers because it preserves a first-person or testimonial account connected to science, evidence, and expertise, while also engaging technology, data, and platforms. Such accounts can document how an issue was understood and experienced from within the period or community being discussed.
Historical significance
As a publication record from 2012 at Cristan’s Research, “And we’re back” provides dated evidence of how science, evidence, and expertise was being argued in relation to technology, data, and platforms. Comparing it with earlier and later records can reveal changes in vocabulary, evidence, and emphasis.
Policy significance
No dominant policy frame was detected in “And we’re back.” Its policy relevance, when present, is therefore likely indirect: the article’s treatment of science, evidence, and expertise may shape later arguments about institutions or public practice rather than proposing a specific rule.
Ranked themes and framings
Rank 1 is the dominant inferred theme or framing. Parent labels identify broader theme families; the relationship key beneath the diagram explains the line styles used for hierarchy, same-family relationships, overlap, and separate-but-related themes.
Themes
- 1Science, evidence, and expertiseTheme family: Knowledge, history, and communication100%
- 2Technology, data, and platformsTheme family: Knowledge, history, and communication100%
Academic framing
- 1100%
Editorial function
Source topics
- Overlapping themes
These classifications are inferred from article text and source metadata and remain directly editable. Relationship labels express corpus-analysis judgments, not immutable facts.
How “Science, evidence, and expertise” appears across the Collective corpus
This article was published during the theme’s highest-presence year in the registered corpus (2012).
Relative presence by year
Peak year indexed to 100Presence by member publication
Frequently co-occurring concepts
Academic framings in this topic
Policy framings in this topic
Values measure relative presence in the registered Collective corpus, not public search interest or public opinion.
Documented circulation and reception
No broad reception evidence has been documented yet; this may reflect unconfigured or incomplete indexes rather than an absence of circulation. These observations describe circulation and reuse; they do not assign cultural worth or evaluate the communities, arguments, or people discussed.
Evidence by channel
Independent counts; bars are not additiveNo channel totals are available yet.
Coverage of the evidence search
Shows what has actually been checkedNo individual references have been stored yet. This can mean that source-held pingbacks have not been imported, provider access is not configured, or available indexes do not expose this work in a machine-readable form.
Counts describe documented circulation and reception in the sources currently available to the Collective. They are not a score of quality, merit, popularity, or social value, and provider totals can overlap.
Author profiles and related researchers
Related authors in the Collective corpus
Related authors are calculated from co-authorship, shared themes and framings, and citation relationships in the registered corpus. This does not imply a personal or institutional association.
Continue through the Collective
A Shezow Game: Spot the TERF!
Approaches the shared subject through a related analytical or disciplinary frame.
Horror of horrors: there’s a cartoon wherein a boy puts on a ring that dresses him up like a female superhero. You just know that’s going to bring…
VICTORY in Texas: Activism Works!
Offers a critical, contrasting, or corrective interpretation of the shared issue.
The transadvocate recently reported on the efforts of the Texas radical right to derail a proposed LGBT non-discrimination policy in San Antonio. As noted, the proposed ordinance wasn’t…
1974: TERFs & Trans Folk
Examines legal, institutional, or policy consequences connected to the shared theme.
The following article was published in 1974, one year after TERFs politicized the use of restrooms, advocated for the public exclusion of trans people in the queer rights…
TLC’s Masen Davis: What Happens Next With AB 1266
Examines legal, institutional, or policy consequences connected to the shared theme.
A brief video filmed in early November, 2013, with Masen Davis of the Transgender Law Center. In this video he discusses what we can expect in the next…