Collective article record

ROGD researcher caught lying to the press

Collective Archive Number CAN-0000-0140-0CE7 Permanent resolver

Source Summary

Dr. Littman lies, possibly misleading parents into withholding care from trans kids. Listen to this article Recently the author of a Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria (ROGD) study lied to a credulous Canadian reporter who printed misleading medical and psychological information that can encourage parents to withhold evidence-based care from their children. The following is an excerpt from Canada’s The Globe and Mail newspaper: Dr. Littman describes the condition experienced by these girls as “rapid-onset gender dysphoria” (ROGD). It develops during or soon after puberty and mainly affects girls with no previous signs of childhood gender dysphoria. Many, however, do have a history of mental illness, and some are on the autism spectrum. The most controversial element of Dr. Littman’s research is her claim that ROGD spreads via social and peer contagion. ROGD also spreads by social media according to Dr. Littman; some parents describe their daughters binge-watching YouTube transition videos.

The Source Summary reproduces the first 150 words of the source article unless a Collective editor has explicitly locked a replacement.

Read the original article View inbound sources

Interpretive context

Why this article may matter

Community significance

“ROGD researcher caught lying to the press” may matter to community readers because it connects transgender identity and history with organizing, advocacy, or collective experience. Its discussion of science, evidence, and expertise gives readers a concrete point of entry into the concerns and strategies represented in the article.

Historical significance

The article may have historical value because it explicitly interprets or preserves material concerning transgender identity and history. Published in 2018 by Transadvocate.com, it can be read both for the history it describes and as evidence of how science, evidence, and expertise was framed at that moment.

Policy significance

“ROGD researcher caught lying to the press” discusses institutions, law, or governance in connection with transgender identity and history. Even without a dominant policy classification, the article may help researchers identify practical consequences for science, evidence, and expertise.

Content analysis

Ranked themes and framings

Rank 1 is the dominant inferred theme or framing. Parent labels identify broader theme families; the relationship key beneath the diagram explains the line styles used for hierarchy, same-family relationships, overlap, and separate-but-related themes.

Themes

1
Transgender identity and historyTheme family: Identity, culture, and community
100%
2
Science, evidence, and expertiseTheme family: Knowledge, history, and communication
76%
3
Education and youthTheme family: Institutions, law, and public life
54%
4
Healthcare and medicineTheme family: Institutions, law, and public life
28%
5
Culture, identity, and representationTheme family: Identity, culture, and community
26%
6
Media, rhetoric, and discourseTheme family: Knowledge, history, and communication
23%

Academic framing

1
Clinical and medical analysis
100%
2
Psychological analysis
74%
3
Historical analysis
44%
4
Media and discourse analysis
19%

Editorial function

Source topics

Relationship key

Overlapping themes
Separate but related themes
Related theme in the same family

The diagram distinguishes hierarchy, same-family relationships, overlap, and separate-but-related themes inferred within this article. It does not assert that all themes are mutually exclusive.

These classifications are inferred from article text and source metadata and remain directly editable. Relationship labels express corpus-analysis judgments, not immutable facts.

Granular comparative context

How “Transgender identity and history” appears across the Collective corpus

This article appeared 5 year(s) after the theme’s highest annual presence in the registered corpus in 2013.

Relative presence by year

Peak year indexed to 100

5 2004

11 2005

4 2006

90 2007

64 2008

47 2009

14 2010

130 2011

112 2012

240 2013

126 2014

33 2015

28 2016

50 2017

41 2018

15 2019

2 2020

4 2021

2 2024

1 2025

Presence by member publication

Frequently co-occurring concepts

Academic framings in this topic

Policy framings in this topic

Values measure relative presence in the registered Collective corpus, not public search interest or public opinion.

Inbound-link and citation evidence

Documented circulation and reception

The documented sources span 1 domain; the strongest available scholarly index reports 257 citing works. The dated evidence currently spans 2018–2025. These observations describe circulation and reuse; they do not assign cultural worth or evaluate the communities, arguments, or people discussed.

100distinct source records documented

1distinct referring domains

257best available scholarly cited-by count

0books or volumes documented

0references retained by the source publication

2018–2025observed years in dated evidence

Evidence by channel

Independent counts; bars are not additive

Scholarly citing works257

Coverage of the evidence search

Shows what has actually been checked

Publisher-held referencesChecked · August 31, 2026

Scholarly indexesChecked · August 31, 2026

257

Book and volume searchNotchecked

Public-web searchNotconfigured

Collective corpus linksIndexed · August 31, 2026

257 Crossref245 OpenCitations

Review scholarly results Review book results Review public-web results

Documented references over time

Yearly scholarly series: OpenCitations, combined with dated non-scholarly evidence

1 2018

6 2019

9 2020

13 2021

17 2022

22 2023

17 2024

15 2025