This profile is a persistent identity and corpus record. Bibliographic facts, author-supplied information, editorial verification, computational measurements, model inferences, and external indexes are identified separately throughout the page.
Profile status
Unclaimed
8registered publications
17,124analyzed words
2011–2013represented publication period
3.5effective primary themes
5documented inbound sources/citations
1member publications represented
Interactive corpus map
Patterns in registered work
Explore how recurring themes and framings connect across this author’s registered publications. Each topic opens its Collective archive.
ThemeAcademic framingPolicy framingRecurring co-occurrenceConnection across framing typesBroader and narrower term
Drag a topic to rearrange the map. Drag empty space to move the constellation, use the mouse wheel or controls to zoom, and hover or focus a topic to emphasize its direct connections. Line strength reflects recurrence in this author’s registered corpus; it does not imply agreement or causation.
This analysis covers 8 registered publications dated 2011–2013. Full source text was available for 8 records, partial text for 0, and metadata only for 0.
The registered corpus is the unit of analysis. These statistics describe available texts and metadata; they are not claims about the author’s personality, intelligence, intentions, identity, or private beliefs.
8publications analyzed
1,227median words per publication
100.0%full-text coverage
0.0%archival-copy coverage
0co-authored publications
0possible duplicate groups
Registered output by year
PublicationsDocumented reception
12
2011
10
2012
63
2013
Registered publication output trends upward across the represented years. Linear model R²: 0.75.
Publication-length distribution
4526–1,248
11,248–1,970
11,970–2,692
02,692–3,415
13,415–4,137
04,137–4,859
04,859–5,581
15,581–6,303
Mean 2,141 words · median 1,227 · standard deviation 1,984.
Transgender identity and history · Feminism and gender politics · Race and intersectionality · Culture, identity, and representation
Potential change points compare rolling three-year thematic distributions with Jensen-Shannon divergence. They are model-derived boundaries, not authoritative divisions in the author’s intellectual biography.
Theme ecology
Breadth, concentration, and communities
90.6%normalized thematic breadth
3.5effective primary themes
0.313theme concentration (HHI)
100%mean primary-theme confidence
Primary-theme assignments are broadly distributed. The most recurrent primary themes are Transgender identity and history, Feminism and gender politics, Race and intersectionality.
Proximity reflects corpus-relative lexical similarity. Larger nodes have more documented inbound evidence; node color reflects the primary theme.
Publication; color identifies primary themeStronger lexical similarityLarger node: more documented reception
The semantic map uses TF-IDF vectors and cosine similarity within this registered corpus. Position is produced by a force layout from the strongest similarity edges; proximity is relative, not an absolute measure of meaning.
Axes are normalized to display scales stated in the methods note; the chart is comparative within the profile, not a grading instrument.
Sentence-length distribution
1612–17
23817–33
13033–48
4348–63
1363–78
678–94
394–109
3109–124
1.5questions per 1,000 words
12.4quoted passages per 1,000 words
2.4outbound links per 1,000 words
Distinctive terms relative to the Collective baseline
queer16.8
culture13.7
marginalized12.7
minority12.0
rather11.7
majority11.4
identities11.1
transsexuals10.3
dominant9.5
straight9.4
communities9.2
gender9.2
often9.1
book9.1
cisgender8.6
excluded8.5
cultural8.4
appropriate8.3
View rates and comparison values
Term
Author rate / 1,000
Collective rate / 1,000
Log-odds z
queer
9.69
0.71
16.82
culture
6.42
0.47
13.70
marginalized
5.33
0.14
12.67
minority
4.60
0.24
11.98
rather
5.70
0.68
11.66
majority
4.36
0.29
11.44
identities
4.24
0.32
11.12
transsexuals
5.45
0.89
10.25
dominant
3.03
0.07
9.49
straight
3.39
0.34
9.44
communities
3.27
0.33
9.25
gender
16.48
7.16
9.17
often
4.36
0.72
9.14
book
3.51
0.43
9.10
cisgender
3.88
0.66
8.56
excluded
2.30
0.11
8.54
cultural
2.42
0.19
8.40
appropriate
2.79
0.32
8.33
instances
2.06
0.11
8.05
movements
2.06
0.14
7.86
group
6.67
2.10
7.84
umbrella
2.91
0.43
7.80
appropriation
7.76
0.01
7.78
double
1.94
0.05
7.75
Lexical statistics are descriptive properties of the available texts. They do not diagnose writing quality, intelligence, personality, or intent. Distinctive terms are compared with a sampled Collective baseline using smoothed log-odds.
Source families are inferred from link domains and URL patterns. They describe the ecology of linked evidence and references, not the reliability or ideological position of an individual source.
Collaboration and relationships
Co-authorship and corpus similarity
Author relationship network
Co-authorship and corpus-based similarity are displayed as different relationship types.
Co-authorship, corpus similarity, citation relationships, and publication overlap are shown as distinct relationship types. A corpus relationship does not imply a personal, institutional, or political association.
Documented circulation and reception
How evidence of reuse is distributed across the corpus
5documented source records
5distinct referring domains
0scholarly citation records or provider total
0books or edited-volume references
37.5%publications with evidence
0.675reception concentration (Gini)
Evidence by channel
Source-publication references5
Public-web references0
Scholarly citing works0
Books and edited volumes0
Links inside the Collective0
Media and educational references0
Documented references over time
22011
22013
12017
Reception concentration
The most-referenced 10% of publications account for approximately 40.0% of documented reception.
Reception measures documented circulation and reuse across the evidence sources available to the Collective. They do not establish quality, correctness, cultural worth, or the author’s social standing. Provider totals can overlap.
Comparative corpus context
Contrasts with other registered Collective publications
The comparison baseline contains 1,200 other registered publications. Differences are descriptive contrasts, not author rankings.
Comparisons use the rest of the registered Collective as the default baseline. Percentage-point differences and standardized effects describe corpus contrasts; they are not rankings or evaluations of authors.
Corpus coverage
Places, institutions, periods, and populations represented
Geographic coverage
United States6
Canada1
Europe1
Institutions named
Kinsey Institute1
Rutgers University1
Historical periods
2010s4
2000s3
1990s1
1970s1
1900s1
Populations discussed
activists and organizers8
women7
transgender people6
children and adolescents4
disabled people2
racial and ethnic communities2
families and parents2
students and educators1
Coverage measures recurring places, institutions, historical periods, scopes, and population terms in the registered texts. It describes what is present in the corpus and does not judge omissions or infer the author’s identity or attitudes.
Guided reading paths
Different ways into the registered corpus
Representative workClosest to the semantic center of recurring work in the registered corpus.
These categories describe structural positions in the registered corpus. They do not establish scholarly quality, correctness, or cultural value.
Trust, correction, and reuse
Provenance, profile control, and research data
How to read this profile
Source-supplied
Provided by a member publication.
Author-verified
Confirmed by the profile owner.
Editor-verified
Reviewed by a Collective editor.
Computationally measured
Calculated directly from registered text or metadata.
Model-inferred
Produced by a versioned analytical model.
External index
Obtained from an external bibliographic or web index.
Profile actions
Authors and other knowledgeable parties may request identity corrections, article-association review, classification review, or visibility changes. Requests create an editorial revision record rather than silently replacing prior data.
Over the last year or so, I have read a number of blog entries and Facebook rants about the so-called “transsexual versus transgender” issue. For those who are unaware of this debate, it stems from a subset of…
So about once every year or two, somebody comes out as trans in a rather high profile way. Two years ago it was Chaz Bono. Before that there was Christine Daniels, Susan Stanton, and others before them. When…
I’ve been meaning to post this for a while now, as an explanation and reference for what I’ve been calling FAAB-mentality (described below). I originally wrote and performed this piece for the fourth annual installment of Girl Talk:…
As a white person, I never have to think about race, except on those rare occasions when I am in a non-white majority space. I never think about being a U.S. citizen except when I am outside the…
So lots of new stuff to report: First, I have a brand new email list! If you sign up for it, you will receive monthly(ish) updates about all my upcoming performances and speaking events, newly released books, articles,…
So last week, my new book, Excluded: Making Feminist and Queer Movements More Inclusive, was reviewed in Publisher’s Weekly – you can read the review here. It is generally positive and I am pretty happy with it! However,…
Within the activist circles I run in, I routinely hear people accuse others of appropriation, or claim that certain behaviors or endeavors are appropriative. I myself have written about how certain people (e.g., cisgender academics and media producers)…
This is the one in a series of blog posts in which I discuss some of the concepts and terminology that I forward in my writings, including my new book Excluded: Making Feminist and Queer Movements More Inclusive.…
