1956: D.O. Cauldwell’s “Transvestism… Men in Female Dress”
Back Dustcover Flap TRANSVESTISM …men female dress edited by DAVID O. CAULDWELL Sc.D., M.D. Dr. Cauldwell is a distinguished physician and sexologist who is Medical Advisor to Sexology magazine and Editor of its Question and Answer Department. A specialist in industrial and military medicine, he was formerly a civilian medical officer in the Adjutant General’s Department of the United States Army. He is the author of many books dealing with medicine, public health, sex deviations and sex education. Among his many works are Why Males Wear Female Attire, The Intimate Embrace, William Heirens — A Study of Sex Crimes and Criminals, What Is a Hermaphrodite? and Revelations of a Sexologist, Dr. Cauldwell has made an outstanding contribution to the study to the sexual behavior of human beings during the course of a lifetime of scientific research and medical practice. The First Authoritative Book On Transvestism Scientific discussions of the causes,
The Source Summary reproduces the first 150 words of the source article unless a Collective editor has explicitly locked a replacement.
Why this article may matter
Community significance
“1956: D.O. Cauldwell’s “Transvestism… Men in Female Dress”” may matter to affected communities because it organizes evidence or documented claims about healthcare and medicine and places them alongside science, evidence, and expertise. This can help readers distinguish the article’s evidentiary contribution from broader commentary on the subject.
Historical significance
As a publication record from 2012 at Cristan’s Research, “1956: D.O. Cauldwell’s “Transvestism… Men in Female Dress”” provides dated evidence of how healthcare and medicine was being argued in relation to science, evidence, and expertise. Comparing it with earlier and later records can reveal changes in vocabulary, evidence, and emphasis.
Policy significance
“1956: D.O. Cauldwell’s “Transvestism… Men in Female Dress”” discusses institutions, law, or governance in connection with healthcare and medicine. Even without a dominant policy classification, the article may help researchers identify practical consequences for science, evidence, and expertise.
Ranked themes and framings
Rank 1 is the dominant inferred theme or framing. Parent labels identify broader theme families; the relationship key beneath the diagram explains the line styles used for hierarchy, same-family relationships, overlap, and separate-but-related themes.
Themes
- 1Healthcare and medicineTheme family: Institutions, law, and public life100%
- 2Science, evidence, and expertiseTheme family: Knowledge, history, and communication100%
- 3Education and youthTheme family: Institutions, law, and public life35%
Academic framing
- 1100%
- 249%
- 333%
Editorial function
Source topics
- Overlapping themes
- Related theme in the same family
These classifications are inferred from article text and source metadata and remain directly editable. Relationship labels express corpus-analysis judgments, not immutable facts.
How “Healthcare and medicine” appears across the Collective corpus
This article appeared 1 year(s) before the theme reached its highest annual presence in the registered corpus in 2013.
Relative presence by year
Peak year indexed to 100Presence by member publication
Frequently co-occurring concepts
Academic framings in this topic
Policy framings in this topic
Values measure relative presence in the registered Collective corpus, not public search interest or public opinion.
Documented circulation and reception
No broad reception evidence has been documented yet; this may reflect unconfigured or incomplete indexes rather than an absence of circulation. These observations describe circulation and reuse; they do not assign cultural worth or evaluate the communities, arguments, or people discussed.
Evidence by channel
Independent counts; bars are not additiveNo channel totals are available yet.
Coverage of the evidence search
Shows what has actually been checkedNo individual references have been stored yet. This can mean that source-held pingbacks have not been imported, provider access is not configured, or available indexes do not expose this work in a machine-readable form.
Counts describe documented circulation and reception in the sources currently available to the Collective. They are not a score of quality, merit, popularity, or social value, and provider totals can overlap.
Author profiles and related researchers
Related authors in the Collective corpus
Related authors are calculated from co-authorship, shared themes and framings, and citation relationships in the registered corpus. This does not imply a personal or institutional association.
Continue through the Collective
Common Sense or Science? You Choose!
Provides a contextually related perspective from elsewhere in the Collective.
Generic Confusion’s author, Greg wonders about allowing gender dysphoric children to choose their gender: “What are parents to do when their child says he’s tired of being a…
Fear & Loathing Between My Legs, Pt. 2
Approaches the shared subject through a related analytical or disciplinary frame.
Obamacare Vagina: Medicaid Coverage of SRS, Part Two By Rani Baker @destroyed4com4t Listen to this article At the buttcrack of dawn one morning in late August 2016, I…
Hold Dr. Keith Ablow Responsible… NOW!
Offers a critical, contrasting, or corrective interpretation of the shared issue.
Note: Update 9/19/2011, here’s my ethics complaint letter against Dr. Ablow before I sent it off today: By now, you are probably aware of the disgusting and shameful…
PJI Has Plan Bs
Examines legal, institutional, or policy consequences connected to the shared theme.
If we don’t get it — enough signatures — we have to get over a half-a-million signatures, and if we don’t…we aren’t able to get enough signatures, then…